REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
The Regular Council Meeting was held on July 13, 2009 at 7:30 p.m. with Council President Williams presiding. Council members present were Mr. Leary, Mrs. Russell, Mr. McGlumphy, Mr. McGiffin, Mr. Hogan, and Mr. Salters. Mr. Slavin and Mr. Ruane were absent.
Council staff members present were Police Chief Horvath, Ms. Russell, Mrs. Mitchell, Mrs. Townshend, Mr. DePrima, City Solicitor Rodriguez, Mrs. McDowell, and Mayor Carey.
OPEN FORUM
The Open Forum was held at 7:15 p.m., prior to commencement of the Official Council Meeting. Council President Williams declared the Open Forum in session and reminded those present that Council is not in official session and cannot take formal action.
There was no one present wishing to speak during the Open Forum.
The invocation was given by Chaplain Dixon, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance.
AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS
Mr. Hogan moved for approval of the agenda, seconded by Mr. McGlumphy and unanimously carried.
Mr. Salters moved for approval of the Consent Agenda, seconded by Mr. Leary and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Slavin and Mr. Ruane absent).
ADOPTION OF MINUTES - REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 22, 2009
The Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of June 22, 2009 were unanimously approved by motion of Mr. Salters, seconded by Mr. Leary and bore the written approval of Mayor Carey (with the exception of the following motion: 1) adoption of the following 2009/2010 City of Dover Budget Ordinances - General Fund - Cash Receipts and Budget; Water/Wastewater Fund - Revenue and Budget; and Electric Revenue Fund - Revenue and Budget).
PRESENTATION - CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION - 4TH OF JULY CELEBRATION COMMITTEE
The following Certificate of Appreciation was read into the record by Mayor Carey:
WHEREAS, the City of Dover Fourth of July Celebration Committee was established by Council on December 8, 2003, after the Central Delaware Chamber of Commerce decided they could no longer lead this effort; and
WHEREAS, members of the Fourth of July Celebration Committee have worked tirelessly to ensure that the citizens of Dover and surrounding communities could take pride in patriotic commemorations in the Capital City; and
WHEREAS, as a result of their efforts and community support, which has enabled us to celebrate our independence on July 4th, with many festivities, culminating with a fireworks display on Legislative Mall, it is deemed an honor and a privilege to present this
Certificate of Appreciation to
Greg Patterson
Dave Bonar Elaine Brenchley
Brad Holden Donna Mitchell
CITY OF DOVER
FOURTH OF JULY CELEBRATION COMMITTEE
With Sincerest Gratitude from the City of Dover
July 2009
On behalf of the Mayor and Council, Mayor Carey presented the Certificate to the members of the Fourth of July Celebration Committee.
PRESENTATION - CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION - JUANA FUENTES-BOWLES - DELAWARE HUMAN RELATIONS OFFICE
Due to the absence of Ms. Juana Fuentes-Bowles, the City Clerk read the following Certificate of Appreciation into the record:
This certificate of recognition is being awarded to Juana Fuentes-Bowles. The City of Dover proudly recognizes you for your outstanding contribution in aiding the Dover Human Relations Commission and congratulates you on your retirement. Respectfully signed and presented on July thirteenth two thousand and nine.
MAYOR CARLETON E. CAREY, SR. VETOES - MOTIONS ADOPTED BY CITY COUNCIL ON JUNE 22, 2009 - ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2009/2010 GENERAL FUND - CASH RECEIPTS AND BUDGET ORDINANCE; ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2009/2010 WATER/WASTEWATER FUND - REVENUE AND BUDGET ORDINANCE; AND ADOPTION OF FISCAL YEAR 2009/2010 ELECTRIC REVENUE FUND - REVENUE AND BUDGET ORDINANCE
During their Regular Meeting of June 22, 2009, by a vote of six (6) yes, two (2) no (Mrs. Russell and Mr. Slavin), and one (1) absent (Mr. Ruane), Council adopted the Fiscal Year 2009/2010 General Fund - Cash Receipts and Budget Ordinance; Fiscal Year 2009/2010 Water/Wastewater Fund - Revenue and Budget Ordinance; and Fiscal Year 2009/2010 Electric Revenue Fund - Revenue and Budget Ordinance.
On June 23, 2009, the City Clerk received a letter from Mayor Carleton E. Carey, Sr. disapproving the motions, which stated:
“RE:Motion to Approve the City of Dover Fiscal Year 2009-2010 Budget Ordinances. Referring to Furloughs for All City of Dover Employees and Emergency Ambulance Services. Agenda Items 16.A.a-1 General Fund - Cash Receipts and Budget, 16.A a-6 Water/Wastewater Fund - Revenue and Budget, and 16.A a-10 Electric Revenue Fund - Revenue and Budget
Pursuant to the City of Dover Charter Section 10, I am hereby notifying the City Clerk in writing that I disapprove of the motions passed by Dover City Council at the meeting held on June 22, 2009 to adopt the above referenced ordinances.
I have decided to take this action due to being a public safety issue. It is very important that we have enough police officers on duty to handle the needs of our citizens. Furloughs would cause a serious problem providing adequate staffing to man the shifts to provide protection for our citizens as well as the protection of our police officers in the performance of their duties safely.
The emergency ambulance service that the city has contracted out responded to (5704) five thousand seven hundred and four calls last year. That is (1043) one thousand forty three more calls than the year before. This budget gives the citizens less emergency ambulance service coverage for the increase in emergency calls that they received the year before.
I know the budget is tight but we need to provide enough police and ambulance services to adequately protect our citizens. In my opinion this budget does not do that and I would like the city council to consider finding the money elsewhere in the budget to cover these two very important items.
With this in mind, I have exercised my power of veto and hereby ask you to notify members of council of this action for their consideration during the next regular council meeting.
Sincerely,
Carleton E. Carey, Sr.
Mayor”
Mr. McGiffin moved to reaffirm previous Council action to adopt the Fiscal Year 2009/2010 General Fund - Cash Receipts and Budget Ordinance, seconded by Mr. Leary and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Slavin and Mr. Ruane absent). [Approval of the motion requires a 2/3 majority vote (six affirmative votes) since the original motion was vetoed by Mayor Carey].
Mr. McGiffin moved to reaffirm previous Council action to adopt the Fiscal Year 2009/2010 Water/Wastewater Fund - Revenue and Budget Ordinance, seconded by Mr. Salters and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Slavin and Mr. Ruane absent). [Approval of the motion requires a 2/3 majority vote (six affirmative votes) since the original motion was vetoed by Mayor Carey].
Mr. McGiffin moved to reaffirm previous Council action to adopt the Fiscal Year 2009/2010 Electric Revenue Fund - Revenue and Budget Ordinance, seconded by Mr. Leary and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Slavin and Mr. Ruane absent). [Approval of the motion requires a 2/3 majority vote (six affirmative votes) since the original motion was vetoed by Mayor Carey].
LEGISLATIVE, FINANCE, AND ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE REPORT - JUNE 22, 2009
The Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee met on June 22, 2009 with Chairman McGlumphy presiding.
Review and Recommendation - Filling of Critical Positions
During their meeting of February 23, 2009, members recommended approval of the Hiring Freeze for Fiscal Year 2008-2009, but to allow the hiring of critical positions through the review and approval of the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee and City Council. It was suggested that there be a “standing” agenda item to consider the filling of critical positions and, if there are no positions to consider, the item could be removed.
Mr. McGlumphy noted that there were no critical positions to be considered; therefore, no action was required of the committee.
Proposed Ordinance No. 2009-05 - Chapter 102 - Taxation
During the Committee meeting of April 27, 2009, Ms. Russell, City Assessor, reviewed proposed amendments to Chapter 102 -Taxation, based on an audit of the City of Dover Assessor’s Office, as well as the recommendations of the Tax Appeals Committee and the City Assessor. The Committee tabled the proposed amendments until a legal opinion could be obtained from Mr. Nicholas Rodriguez, City Solicitor, regarding the propriety of penalizing owners of income-producing property with a “denial of appeal” if an Income and Expense Report is not filed. It was noted that the denial of appeal would occur one (1) year following failure to file the report. In addition, it was requested that the wording in Section 102-77 on the Committee Action Form be revised to state “amendment to update the language”.
Mr. Leary moved to lift the matter from the table, seconded by Mr. Salters and unanimously carried.
Ms. Russell advised members that, at the suggestion of Mr. Rodriguez, the following revisions were made:
Section 102-5 (Income and Expense Reports)
This amendment is a new section to allow the Assessor to require that all owners of commercial/industrial income-producing property within the city limits of Dover complete and file annual reports of Income and Expenses on forms developed by the Assessor. Failure to provide the Assessor with an Income and Expense Report will result in a fine of $100.00 (rather than a denial of appeal as was originally proposed). Income and Expense Reports will be mailed to property owners and are due within thirty (30) days of receipt of request by the Assessor. This information is invaluable in developing the value for these income-producing properties. The Income Approach to Valuation is the most common methodology to value these types of property.
Section 102-77 (Duties of City Assessor)
This amendment updates the language used for affixing the stamp to the deeds when they are brought into the Assessor’s Office. In addition, the ordinance clarifies a time period for audits of the Transfer Tax.
Section 102-185 (Appeals)
This amendment is a new section to explain due dates that were established for the Appeals Committee and approved by Council on November 13, 2007. This ordinance also explains that the right to appeal is lost if any designated appeal date is missed; however, the appellant may appeal the following April for the next billing cycle. It also states that appeals/refunds for errors or opinions of value from appellants will not be heard for prior years. This has been the common practice in the Assessor’s Office.
Ms. Russell added that the proposed ordinance amendments have been reviewed by Mr. Nicholas Rodriguez, City Solicitor, who stated that the amendments are in good order and, in his opinion, will serve the purpose intended.
In response to Mr. Salters, Ms. Russell stated that other municipalities charge fines ranging from $50.00 to $500.00 for failure to file an Income and Expense Report.
Responding to Mr. Shevock, Ms. Russell indicated that this ordinance would regulate commercial and industrial income-producing properties and would include apartment buildings that house more than four (4) families.
The Committee recommended adoption of Proposed Ordinance No. 2009-05 amending Chapter 102 - Taxation.
By consent agenda, Mr. Salters moved for approval of the Committee's recommendation, seconded by Mr. Leary and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Slavin and Mr. Ruane absent). (The First Reading of the ordinance will take place during the latter part of the meeting).
Phase II of the MAG Study
Mrs. Hawkins, Human Resources Director, reminded members that in 2008, Management Advisory Group (MAG) was hired to perform a review and evaluation of the Pay for Performance (PFP) Evaluation system that is currently utilized for all non-bargaining employees. In September 2008, MAG presented its findings for Phase I of the study, which focused on the classification and compensation of positions and employees. During their meeting of March 9, 2009, the Committee moved to recommend approval of staff’s recommendation for implementation of Phase I of the MAG Report (which was subsequently approved by City Council at their meeting of March 23, 2009). During their meeting of February 23, 2009, the Phase II Report for the Review and Evaluation of the PFP Evaluation System to the City of Dover was presented to the Committee for informational purposes. Mr. DePrima, City Manager, explained at that time that staff would be bringing forward implementation recommendations regarding this phase of the study for the Committee’s review and consideration at a later date.
Mr. DePrima and Mrs. Hawkins provided a handout containing an Organization of Recommendations related to Phase II of the MAG study with proposed changes grouped according to subject area. Mr. McGlumphy reminded the Committee that there would be no action taken on the matter at this time and the study will continue to be returned to the table until all six (6) exhibits related to the report can be reviewed.
An overview of the Organization of Recommendations was presented by Mr. DePrima and Mrs. Hawkins as follows:
Training
In accordance with the MAG recommendations, Mr. DePrima noted that, under this proposal, annual training for supervisors would be required and salary increases would be withheld from supervisors if training is not attended. He noted that the City Manager will have the discretion to excuse a supervisor from training if there are extenuating circumstances.
In response to Mr. McGlumphy, Mrs. Hawkins estimated that approximately 45 employees would qualify as supervisors and training would require approximately one hour of each supervisor’s time.
Mr. DePrima stated that the second recommendation in the training category was an employee suggestion that training be provided to employees so that they could better understand the PFP evaluation process. Mr. DePrima stated that this recommendation has already been implemented and that an informational session has been conducted for employees.
Responding to Mr. Salters, Mr. DePrima stated that repeated annual training for supervisors would be beneficial as an ongoing reminder of how to complete fair and accurate evaluations. He believed that this training would provide an important opportunity for supervisors to receive fresh information and for experienced evaluators to share information they have learned about the process.
Evaluation - Process
Mr. DePrima indicated that MAG suggested that the Director of Human Resources be given a five (5) day time frame to review all evaluations.
Mr. DePrima explained that MAG also recommended that supervisors complete quarterly employee reviews and document these sessions by entering this information into the PFP software system. He noted that quarterly reports were implemented when PFP was first adopted; however, he stated that many supervisors have not complied with this requirement. He stated that quarterly evaluations are being required in response to employees who expressed a need for additional performance feedback.
In response to Dr. Jones, Mr. DePrima explained that the quarterly evaluations are informal in that there is no scoring or grading. He indicated that the focus would be on the employee’s performance and goals and would provide employees and supervisors more opportunity to interact.
Mr. DePrima stated that the next item on the Organization of Recommendations handout sets forth a self-evaluation process for employees. He stated that this provision is being changed from an “encouraged practice” to a “required practice” and that MAG supports this idea.
Concerned that the evaluation process might be excessively cumbersome, Mr. McGlumphy requested Mrs. Hawkins to estimate the amount of work hours that would be required to implement all of the practices listed in the handout to help determine if the evaluations are serving a meaningful purpose.
Mr. DePrima mentioned that, at one time, the City did not conduct employee evaluations at all, and, at that time, Council requested that an evaluation process be instituted for all employees, as this was deemed a valuable practice. Mrs. Hawkins concurred, explaining the value of evaluations in dealing with employees who are not meeting expectations.
Mrs. Williams inquired whether there was any documentation that would suggest that additional evaluations positively impact employee performance, and was particularly concerned about how additional evaluations would be viewed by employees who are currently performing well. She suggested that it might be beneficial to perform a survey to obtain employee input. Mr. DePrima requested that Mrs. Williams advise him on the types of questions she would suggest for such a survey following the meeting.
Mrs. Hawkins added that one of the goals of the study was to examine ways of recognizing and rewarding outstanding performers and she felt that requiring more supervisor/employee interaction might assist in this regard.
Another recommendation by MAG, Mr. DePrima stated, was to provide for statistical normalization. This would be a mechanism that would be used to help compensate for supervisors who consistently score all of their employees lower or higher than other supervisors. He explained that this becomes more problematic if compensation is tied to performance and there are inequities between departments. He indicated that some jurisdictions have researched methods of scoring evaluations to create a statistically normalized score. MAG alerted the City to this potential problem but did not suggest how to manage it. For this reason, it was recommended that it be established as a goal for the Human Resources Director to determine how other jurisdictions are normalizing scores. Councilman Hogan offered to assist with this process.
To address the problem of supervisors who are currently not completing evaluations, Mrs. Hawkins stated that MAG recommended holding all employee salary adjustments until all evaluations are complete and that non-compliant supervisors be listed on the intranet. Mrs. Hawkins and Mr. DePrima did not recommend implementation of this suggestion due to their feeling that publicly listing supervisors was inappropriate and that it would be unfair to postpone salary adjustments due to the negligence of supervisors.
Mr. DePrima and Mrs. Hawkins concurred with MAG’s suggestion to add a core competency to the Human Resources Director’s goals to ensure that the Director monitors the evaluation process. They stated that effectively completing evaluations would be added to the core competencies of the supervisors as well.
Mr. DePrima stated that requiring periodic reviews will reduce the amount of work to be done by supervisors at the end of the year, when final evaluations are due.
Dr. Jones noted that if reviews are performed on a quarterly basis, notes are documented at that time, information is being entered into the PFP software, and the results impact the employee’s final evaluation, it appears that quarterly reports constitute more of a formal than an informal review. She inquired whether there is written acknowledgment by the employee and the supervisor at the time of the quarterly review as to the status of the employee’s performance.
Mrs. Hawkins explained that a formal evaluation constitutes an evaluation of all core competencies, entering all remarks and scores, and signing off on the evaluation. Informal evaluation is a periodic meeting where goals are examined and discussed and progress is entered. If performance problems are identified at that time, Human Resources will be consulted and the evaluation process will be escalated from informal to formal.
Dr. Jones reiterated her concern with employees receiving a clear indication of performance and felt that employees should have an opportunity to acknowledge even an “informal” assessment.
Concurring with Dr. Jones, Mr. Shevock suggested that employees acknowledge what is written during the quarterly reviews to validate the outcome of the evaluation. Without an employee signature, there is no proof of the events that transpired during a review session. Mr. DePrima stated that he understood this point and that it should be considered.
Mr. DePrima stated that in order to make the evaluation process less cumbersome, it was proposed to eliminate the need to include explanatory remarks if the employee is achieving a baseline score of three (3) (performing the job as outlined in the job description). Scores higher or lower than a three (3) would require explanation.
Mrs. Hawkins explained that the next recommendation established the need for probationary employees to adapt to the work environment before determining goals for evaluation.
Responding to Mrs. Russell, Mr. DePrima explained that bargaining unit employee evaluations are not tied to compensation and that the City’s bargaining units were not interested in adopting the new format or Pay For Performance procedures. He stated that they use an older form that does not have goals outlined and includes only core competency. He mentioned that members of the IBEW Union have agreed to begin using a Pay For Performance form and will be incorporating goals into their evaluations next year.
Mr. DePrima explained that his own evaluation is completed by City Council using a form similar to that used by other City employees, although slightly different language regarding core competency is incorporated in the evaluation forms of all Council appointees.
Mr. McGlumphy reiterated his concern regarding making the evaluation process too cumbersome and requested that Mrs. Hawkins equate time frames with requirements to provide input.
The Committee tabled further consideration of the MAG study until the next Committee meeting scheduled for July 13, 2009.
By consent agenda, Mr. Salters moved for approval of the committee's recommendation, seconded by Mr. Leary and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Slavin and Mr. Ruane absent).
By consent agenda, Mr. Salters moved for acceptance of the Legislative, Finance, and Administration Committee Report, seconded by Mr. Leary and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Slavin and Mr. Ruane absent).
SAFETY ADVISORY AND TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE REPORT - JUNE 24, 2009
The Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee met on June 24, 2009 with Chairman Slavin presiding.
Briefing on DelDOT Projects
Mr. Gary Laing, Community Relations Officer and Municipal Liaison for DelDOT, provided an update on the following DelDOT projects:
The West Dover Connector
Mr. Laing advised members that there has been no progress on this project for the last several months due to regulatory procedures.
South Governors Avenue Improvements
Mr. Laing advised members that the project is moving slower than anticipated due to weather conditions. He noted that, due to the bridge being higher than the road surface, fill is needed. The type of fill being used needs to compact prior to laying the next layer and that cannot take place in wet weather. Mr. Laing stated that the parapets have been poured and the crews have been working around the area where utility poles need to be moved. He noted that, originally, the project completion date was May or June; however, it is now projected for the end of July.
Responding to Mr. Hogan, Mr. Laing stated that once the bridge is opened, there will be no more full closures, only lane closures or restrictions.
Water Street Railroad Connector
Mr. Laing stated that he does not anticipate that this project will proceed in the near future. He advised members that the railroad company indicated that undertaking this project would necessitate the closure of another “at-grade” railroad crossing somewhere else in Delaware. Mr. Laing stated that, along with the railroad stipulations, there is also a lack of funding for this project. He indicated that some of the issues in this area will be resolved with the opening of the West Dover Connector.
North State Street Rebuild
Mr. Laing stated DelDOT’s Pavement Management Division sent a survey to the residents of State Street, Queen Street, Division Street, Walker Road, and Loockerman Street last fall asking them if they would be agreeable to nighttime work (based upon Bond Bill Regulations). The public response was that they would not mind.
Responding to Mr. Slavin, Mr. Laing stated he would forward the results of the survey to the Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee. He advised members that, at this time, there is no funding for the North State Street Rebuild; however, funds may be available through the American Recovery Act or excess State funds. Mr. Laing noted that the original start date was the fall of 2009; however, he believed the date would be postponed.
Responding to Mr. Slavin, Mr. Laing stated that better crosswalk markings, signs, and street lights would be included in the North State Street Rebuild; however, traffic calming and bump outs near the cemetery would require a design change which would increase the cost.
Responding to Mr. Hogan, Mr. Laing stated that he would look into the timing of the left-turn light from North State Street onto Division Street.
Briefing on MPO Projects
Mr. James Galvin, Principal Planner with Dover/Kent County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), stated that funds for Transportation Studies from DelDOT will be handled through the MPO.
Mr. Galvin advised members that the MPO has applied for an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) grant for technical assistance to integrate air quality in land use. He also noted that they are working on services to provide technical assistance at a local level, although it probably will not include Kent County.
Mr. Galvin stated that the Transportation Improvement Plan through 2012 has been approved. He noted that some of the improvement projects include the intersection at Clarence and North Streets through Lincoln and Forrest Streets, the intersection at Loockerman and Forrest Avenue, and the realignment of Wyoming Mill Road.
Mr. Galvin advised members that a Walkable Communities Workshop was held and it included a walking tour of State Street, Reed Street, Governors Avenue, and North Street to bring public attention to issues regarding pedestrians. He stated that no major issues were identified, with the exception of the brick sidewalks slanting towards the road on State Street, creating difficulties for wheelchairs. Mr. Galvin stated that the Regional Transportation Plan, especially in small cities like Dover, should consider making areas more pedestrian and bicycle friendly.
Mr. Galvin stated that Kent County has agreed to include the population household projections provided by MPO through the Transportation Improvement Study for their approval process for outside work.
Ms. Wieczoreck, Executive Director of the Dover/Kent County MPO, provided an update on the latest plan for the North Dover Study. She advised members that a request was made to provide a second alternative for a link between Crawford Carroll Avenue at Lowe’s to College Road. Ms. Wieczoreck advised members that the MPO received comments from the Delaware State University College of Agriculture regarding environmentally sensitive areas on the southern side of the college. She noted that the proposed alignment included a section of woods that is used for environmental education, and there were also concerns regarding student and faculty access. Ms. Wieczoreck stated that the proposed alternate route, which was adopted by the MPO Council, will be on the north side of the campus. She also noted that the connector at Crawford Carroll Avenue to the north entrance of the Dover Mall between the Furniture and More store and the former Circuit City building was changed. Ms. Wieczoreck advised members that the connector was shown going through the existing agricultural ponds which where going to be relocated; however, the cost exceeded $6 million dollars; therefore, an alternate route around the ponds was proposed.
Ms. Wieczoreck advised members that the Regional Transportation Plan has been approved and will be ready for publication shortly. She noted that an executive summary will be available to those who prefer a shorter version of the plan.
By consent agenda, Mr. Salters moved for acceptance of the Safety Advisory and Transportation Committee Report, seconded by Mr. Leary and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Slavin and Mr. Ruane absent).
MONTHLY REPORTS - MAY 2009
By motion of Mr. Salters, seconded by Mr. Leary, the following monthly reports were accepted by consent agenda:
Budget Report
Chief of Police Report
City Assessor Report
City Manager's Report
Planning and Inspections Report
Dover Fire Department Report
CIP Report
REAPPOINTMENT RECOMMENDED BY MAYOR CAREY - ETHICS COMMISSION - NANCY SHEVOCK - FIVE (5) YEAR TERM TO EXPIRE JULY 31, 2014
Mayor Carey recommended the reappointment of Mrs. Nancy Shevock to serve on the Ethics Commission for a five (5) year term to expire July 31, 2014.
By consent agenda, Mr. Salters moved for approval of the reappointment of Mrs. Shevock, as recommended by Mayor Carey. The motion was seconded by Mr. Leary and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Slavin and Mr. Ruane absent).
APPOINTMENT RECOMMENDED BY MAYOR CAREY - DOVER 4TH OF JULY CELEBRATION COMMITTEE - KAREN NICKERSON (TO FILL THE EXPIRED TERM OF CINDY SMALL - TERM TO EXPIRE MAY 10, 2010)
Mayor Carey recommended the appointment of Ms. Karen Nickerson to serve on the Dover 4th of July Celebration Committee (to fill the expired term of Cindy Small), for a term to expire May 10, 2010.
By consent agenda, Mr. Salters moved for approval of the appointment of Ms. Nickerson, as recommended by Mayor Carey. The motion was seconded by Mr. Leary and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Slavin and Mr. Ruane absent).
FIRST READING - PROPOSED ORDINANCES
Council President Williams reminded the public that copies of the proposed ordinance are available at the entrance of the Council Chambers or can be obtained from the City Clerk's Office. Final action by Council on the proposed ordinances will take place during the Council Meeting of July 27, 2009.
In accordance with Section 1-9 of the Dover Code, Council acknowledged the First Reading of the Ordinance Amendments, as read by the City Clerk, by title only, as follows:
2009-05 - Chapter 102 - Taxation
Article I - In General, Section 102-5 - Income and Expense Reports
Article III - Realty Transfer Tax, Section 102-77 - Duties of City Assessor
Article VI - Exemptions; Tax Appeals Committee, Section 102-185 - Appeals
2009-16- Chapter 2 - Administration, Article IV - Officers and Employees, Division 1 - Generally, Section 2-201 (2) - Compensation and expenses for mayor, council, employees and other elected or appointed officials; Councilmembers generally
COUNCIL MEMBERS ANNOUNCEMENTS
Mr. McGiffin announced that the next African American Festival would be held on June 26, 2010.
Mr. Hogan announced that the Capital District Convention of the Kiwanis would be held at the Sheraton Inn from August 21st through the 23rd.
Mr. Salters announced that there would be a workshop on making steel drums from July 27th through the 29th at 54 South Kirkwood Street and invited the youth to attend.
Mr. McGlumphy moved for adjournment, seconded by Mr. Leary and unanimously carried.
Meeting Adjourned at 7:46 P.M.
TRACI A. McDOWELL
CITY CLERK
All orders, ordinances, and resolutions adopted by City Council during their Regular Meeting of July 13, 2009, are hereby approved.
CARLETON E. CAREY, SR.
MAYOR
/TM
S:ClerksOfficeAgendas&MinutesCouncil-Minutes20058-22-2005 Council.wpd