REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
The Regular Council Meeting was held on February 24, 2003 at 7:30 p.m. with Council President Carey presiding. Council members present were Mr. Ritter, Mr. Pitts, Mrs. Williams, Mr. Truitt, Mr. McGlumphy, Mr. Speed, Mr. Salters, and Mr. Ruane.
Council staff members present were Police Chief Horvath, Mr. Cooper, Mrs. Mitchell, Mr. Jorgenson, Fire Chief Bashista, Mr. DePrima, City Solicitor Rodriguez, Mrs. Green, and Mayor Hutchison.
OPEN FORUM
The Open Forum was held at 7:15 p.m., prior to commencement of the Official Council Meeting. Council President Carey declared the Open Forum in session and reminded those present that Council is not in official session and cannot take formal action.
There was no one present wishing to speak during the Open Forum.
The invocation was given by Chaplain Dixon, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance.
AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS
Mr. Ruane requested the deletion of item #6A, Revenue Requirement Options - Electric Rate Study, and explained the receipt of additional information will require additional review by the Utility Committee. Council President Carey requested the deletion of item #7E - City Manager’s Monthly Report, and item #7H - Robbins Hose Company No. 1. Report. On behalf of the applicant, Mr. Jorgenson requested the deletion of item #9 - Fountain View Senior Apartments Planned Neighborhood Design.
Mr. Speed moved for approval of the agenda, as amended, seconded by Mr. McGlumphy and unanimously carried.
ADOPTION OF MINUTES - SPECIAL COUNCIL WORKSHOP OF FEBRUARY 10, 2003
The Minutes of the Special Council Workshop of February 10, 2003 were unanimously approved by motion of Mr. Salters, seconded by Mr. Truitt and bore the written approval of Mayor Hutchison.
ADOPTION OF MINUTES - REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBRUARY 10, 2003
The Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of February 10, 2003 were unanimously approved by motion of Mrs. Williams, seconded by Mr. Truitt and bore the written approval of Mayor Hutchison.
PRESENTATION BY NANCY KEIPER OF THE U.S. TENNIS ASSOCIATION (USTA) MIDDLE STATES SECTION - CITY OF DOVER PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
On behalf of the Delaware District of the U.S. Tennis Association (USTA) Middle States Section, Ms. Nancy Keiper presented the City of Dover Parks and Recreation Department with the 2002 Non-Profit Organization of the Year Award. She stated that since 1996, the City of Dover Parks and Recreation Department has partnered with the Delaware District of the USTA Middle States Section to offer tennis lessons to juniors and adults for many organizations throughout the City. Ms. Keiper stated that the City’s tennis program is one of the best in the State and relayed appreciation for the efforts of Mr. Zachery Carter, Parks and Recreation Director, and Mr. Steve Pickering, Sports Coordinator, who accepted the award on behalf of the City of Dover.
REVIEW OF SNOW STORM/REMOVAL - CITY MANAGER
Mr. DePrima, City Manager, provided information regarding the recent snow storm. In reality, he stated that this was a paralyzing storm unlike any that the City has experienced for many years in terms of its intensity, duration, winds, and snow fall. The last storm of this magnitude in the City occurred in the mid 1980's. He explained that since that time, the City has grown significantly in terms of the amount of streets to be cared for and people to be served. Currently, the City maintains approximately 150 miles of streets and numerous emergency buildings, such as hospitals and fire stations, that must be served to assure accessibility during these types of storms.
Mr. DePrima stated that the storm was of such a magnitude that building roofs began to collapse and it was necessary to partially open the Emergency Operations Center, which involved the Mayor, Council President, Public Works Director, and Police and Fire Department representatives. The roofs collapsing caused major water line breaks and caused a diversion of equipment and staff, as well as a decline in water levels in our tanks. He stated that it was necessary to have employees of the electric utility respond to these locations and that, in addition to enacting the City snow emergency plan, it was necessary to enact the City’s water emergency plan. Mr. DePrima stated that at this time, in addition to the snow removal crews, electric and water utility staff and all emergency personnel were responding to the situations and the utility dispatch center was fully staffed.
Mr. DePrima explained the priorities of the emergency snow removal plan, which includes keeping the snow emergency routes opened, providing a minimum of one lane accessibility on all streets to allow for emergency response, and assisting emergency personnel, such as doctors, nurses, firemen, and paramedics, throughout the City by plowing them out so that they could report to work. He stated that many comments were received regarding the streets not being plowed to allow for passable traffic. He explained that if time was taken to plow more than one lane per street, there would have been a major delay in plowing many other streets just once, which could have created an emergency hazard; therefore, there was an early decision to have only one lane plowed on all roads to assure accessibility in case there was an emergency such as fire, police, or ambulance response.
Mr. DePrima reported that nine (9) buildings had collapsed or had roof damage, three (3) residential properties with damage, and 15 buildings that were ordered to close due to the threat of collapsing. According to the Inspections and Planning Department, he stated that the total damage, including buildings and inventory, amounted to an estimate of $10,959,000. The City is working with Delaware Emergency Management Association (DEMA) to investigate the possibility of qualifying for disaster relief aid. He noted that although this was a major storm, to his knowledge there were no injuries or deaths.
Mr. DePrima stated that the employees who assisted during this storm gave 110% and he relayed his appreciation for their dedication and efforts. He advised members that many representatives of private businesses assisted the City during this time and relayed appreciation for their assistance. He also thanked the residents for their patience and understanding during this time.
PUBLIC HEARING - COMPENSATION AND CLASSIFICATION REVIEW FOR THE CITY OF DOVER - PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION SERVICES
Members of Council recently received the Compensation and Classification Review for the City of Dover, as prepared by the Public Administration Services. As a part of their review, a public hearing has been set for this time and place to allow for public comment.
Council President Carey declared the public hearing open.
Ms. Vicky Runyon, 206 MacArthur Drive, addressed members as a resident/taxpayer of the City, a City employee, and also as President of the IUE/CWA Local 315, representing the Dover Employees. She stated that the employees disagree with the job descriptions and hourly wages included in the PAS survey. It was their understanding that the job descriptions would be more in-depth and cater more towards the actual job of the employee. The job descriptions presented are very similar to those developed in 1983.
There being no one else wishing to speak, Council President Carey declared the public hearing closed.
Council President Carey noted that written comments will be accepted by the City Clerk’s Office until March 4, 2003 to be made a part of the record. City Clerk Office Note: One (1) letter received from Mr. Steven Artz, Ph.D., dated March 4, 2003. (Exhibit 1).
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE/SCHEDULE
Mr. Jorgenson, City Planner, submitted details regarding the status of the 2003 Comprehensive Plan Update, as follows: 1) “Updating the Comprehensive Plan” summary of the process and goals; 2) summary of 1996 Dover Plan elements and goal statements (page 1-5 - 1-8); 3) Delaware Code Title 29 State Government, §910 Comprehensive Plan Review and Certification Process; 4) 2003 Comprehensive Plan Update: Plan Adoption Schedule; 5) List of Chapters in the 2003 Comprehensive Plan Update; and 6) Questionnaires from the Comprehensive Plan Workshop held on February 2, 2003.
Mr. Jorgenson noted that a Draft Comprehensive Plan Update is scheduled to be completed and forwarded to the Planning Commission for their review during a Special Meeting on March 18, 2003. Members of Council are invited to attend this meeting. If accepted, the Draft Comprehensive Plan Update will be forwarded to the State for their review. Mr. Jorgenson stated that between March 18, 2003 and April 21, 2003, the State Review Process and Public Review Period will be held. During their meeting of April 21, 2003, the Planning Commission will review comments from the State and public. If accepted, the Plan may be adopted with revisions and forwarded to City Council for a public hearing. The public hearings by Council and Plan Certification by the State Planning Office are scheduled to be accomplished in May 2003.
Responding to Mr. Ruane, Mr. Jorgenson indicated that the goals statement included in the Plan Update will be a combination of those in 1996 as well as the recent expressions relayed by the public. Mr. Ruane stated that the Transportation Committee will be reviewing that section of the Plan and suggested that transportation goals also be incorporated in the goals statement.
UTILITY COMMITTEE REPORT
A Special Utility Committee meeting was held on February 6, 2003 with Chairman Ruane presiding.
Annual Engineer’s Report - Electric Fund
The City of Dover Electric Bond Resolution requires that the City retain an independent engineering consultant to inspect the City’s electric system and to review the electric budgets and insurance program. The City has contracted with Burns & McDonnell to perform this year’s analysis. The report provides the information related to the annual review for Fiscal Years 2000 – 2002.
Some of the highlights of the report are as follows, comparing FY 2000 to FY 2002:
1. Growth for the past two years has been approximately 1.2%.
2. Revenues for the past two years increased 2.5%.
3. Purchased power the past two years increased 4.2 percent.
4. KWH’s purchased the past two years decreased approximately 1.0%.
5. Energy losses have continued to improve: 2000 - 5.8%, 2001 - 4.4%, 2002 - 3.9%.
6. Net income has decreased at an average compound rate of 17.9%, attributed to increases in operating and purchased power cost, not offset by a proportional increase in revenues from growth or rates.
7. The revenue and expense budgets for the above-mentioned years provide for the operation and maintenance of the electric system according to sound utility practices.
8. The transfers, beginning balance and interest earnings in the Improvement and Extension Fund are adequate to cover the capital expenditures in Fiscal Year 2003.
9. Revenue tests, according to Section 502 of the 1985 Bond Resolution show sufficient margins above requirements indicating that retail rates are adequate for Fiscal Years 2000 – 2002.
10. It is the Engineering Consultant’s opinion that the City’s power generation facilities are being operated and maintained consistent with accepted electric utility practice, and in general the performance, operation, maintenance, staff, planning and training aspects for the McKee Run and VanSant stations were found to be above average.
11. It is the Engineering Consultant’s opinion that the design, construction, operation and maintenance of the City’s electric transmission and distribution system and the associated facilities are consistent with current generally accepted electric utility standards.
The consultant’s conclusions and recommendations are outlined at the end of each section. The fee for this report is $16,500. Staff recommended acceptance of the Engineer’s Annual Report on the Operation and Maintenance of the Electric System for Fiscal Year 2002, as reviewed by the Finance Director/Treasurer on December 28, 2002.
The committee recommended acceptance of the report as presented.
Mr. Ruane moved for approval of the committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Speed and unanimously carried.
Dedication of Land - Edgell
Mrs. Margaret Edgell has offered to donate a 1-foot by 40-foot parcel (Tax Parcel ED–05-68.13-1-88, consisting of 0.00091 +/- Acres) located along the terminus of Oak Lane. This is a remnant parcel from when the lots on Oak Lane were subdivided by Mrs. Edgell’s husband, who is now deceased. The original purpose for retaining this parcel was to block access to Oak Lane from the adjacent land to the north. At the time of subdivision, the land was vacant. Since then, the Luther Towers complex has been constructed and there is now a fence dividing the Luther Towers property from this property and Oak Lane. Staff recommended acceptance of the parcel, with the condition that all costs related to legal expenses are paid for by Mrs. Edgell.
The committee recommended approval of staff’s recommendation.
Mr. Ruane moved for approval of the committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Salters and carried by a unanimous roll call.
Mr. Speed moved for acceptance of the Utility Committee Report, seconded by Mr. Salters and unanimously carried.
MONTHLY REPORTS - JANUARY 2003
By motion of Mr. McGlumphy, seconded by Mr. Speed, the following monthly reports were accepted by consent agenda:
Budget Report
City Assessor Report
City Clerk/Alderman Report (Fines)
Mayor's Report
Planning and Inspections Report
Referring to the Chief of Police Report, Mr. Speed noted the addition of the “criminal investigations” graph and commended the department on the results, noting that those cases that have been cleared exceed those that were reported. Mr. Speed also relayed congratulations to Lt. Boney, Sgt. Hosfelt, and Cpl. Digirolomo for their promotion on January 28, 2003.
Mr. Speed moved for acceptance of the Chief of Police Report, seconded by Mr. McGlumphy and unanimously carried.
ANNUAL REPORT - POLICE DEPARTMENT
Members were provided with the 2002 Annual Report of the City of Dover Police Department for their review. Chief Horvath reviewed highlights included in the report and advised members that one of the largest challenges for the department was re-accreditation assessment by the Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies (CALEA), which occurred in early December. The assessment team inspected the department in order to ensure that the department was in compliance with the 443 standards set forth by the commission. The assessment team advised Chief Horvath that if they were to grade the Dover Police Department, they would have given them an “A”. He advised members that re-accreditation is sometimes more difficult to achieve than accreditation since the commission allows for time to implement the required standards and for re-accreditation, all standards must be in place.
Chief Horvath also reported that, although total drug offenses are down 16% from 2001, the total drug arrest for the Drugs, Vice & Organized Crime Unit are up 10% over 2001. The overall decrease is an indication that the Patrol Unit is not making as many drug arrests, which is hopefully due to the department’s aggressive enforcement efforts forcing the street level drug dealers off of the streets and into their residences or outside of Dover. Chief Horvath felt confident that the increase in complaints and accidents has also contributed to the Patrol Unit’s decrease in self-initiated drug arrests.
Chief Horvath indicated that the Annual Report is an indication of the high level of dedication and professionalism that the employees of the Dover Police Department posses. The sworn and civilian employees of the Dover Police Department make up a team whose primary goals are to make Dover a safe City for all of its residents and visitors. Chief Horvath stated that the men and women of the Dover Police Department faced many challenges in 2002 and that the department performed very well and rose to meet those challenges. It is his belief that the strong partnerships that have been developed with the citizens and communities in Dover have assisted in the department’s mission to “protect and serve”. It is his feeling that the citizens of Dover have a police department that they can be proud of and assured members that in 2003, the Police Department will continue these efforts and strive to remain one of Delaware’s finest police departments.
Several members commended the Chief of Police on the preparation of an outstanding report that is thorough and easy to understand, feeling that it depicts the quality of the department.
Mr. Speed moved for acceptance of the 2002 Annual Report of the City of Dover Police Department, seconded by Mr. Salters and unanimously carried.
CARTANZA FARMS PROPERTY PLANNED NEIGHBORHOOD DESIGN
The Planning Office has received a proposal to establish a Planned Neighborhood Development (PND) on 39+/- acres of land located on the north side of North Little Creek Road adjacent to the SR-1 off ramp. The property is zoned R-8 (One Family Residential) and AEOZ (Airport Environs Overlay Zone). The owner of record is Cartanza Farms, L.P. and the equitable owner is Tony Ashburn & Son, Inc.
Members were reminded that in accordance with Article 3, Section 24.1(a) of the Zoning Code, City Council must determine whether the proposed project is of such a design and type that it warrants further review by the Planning Commission. If it is determined that further review is warranted, then the project shall proceed to the more detailed Conditional Use Site Plan review and public hearings before the Planning Commission. The “Planned Neighborhood Design Option” was intended to “...encourage superior residential environments through a unified planning process...” by allowing the planned neighborhood design option in the R-20, R-15, R-10, R-8, RM-1, and RM-2 zones through the Conditional Use process.
Mr. Jorgenson explained the proposed project and provided details and sketches depicting the project and its features. He stated that the proposed subdivision would be known as “Lexington Woods”. The applicant proposes the construction of a complex consisting of 8 single family residences, 54 duplexes, and 86 townhouse units, for a total of 148 dwelling units and a total density of 3.8 units per acre. Access to the site would be provided by one point of access from North Little Creek Road. The Comprehensive Plan recommends that the property be utilized for Medium Density Residential development, which would involve developments of between 5 and 8 dwelling units per acre. Mr. Jorgenson also stated that the Comprehensive Plan establishes goals for various types of land uses within the City limits. The stated goal for Residential Land Uses is “to develop and maintain an adequate supply of housing of varying type, size and densities that are aesthetically pleasing and located within neighborhoods designed to promote convenience, conservation, and access to the greater community but which are properly buffered through distance and landscaping from incompatible land uses”.
Mr. Jorgenson reminded members that the PND option is plan specific and allows for a greater variety of housing types and allows for commercial uses while requiring 25% open space. With development of the proposed PND, the project meets all requirements of the City’s Medium Density Residential Comprehensive Plan designation; the land would remain zoned R-8. For these reasons, the Planning Office recommended that the conceptual plan for the Cartanza Farms Property Subdivision (Lexington Woods) be forwarded to the Planning Commission for further review and consideration through the Conditional Use process.
It was noted that if Council chooses to forward the proposed project to the Planning Commission, the applicant has been advised of the requirement of preparing the Conditional Use Site Plan in accordance with the requirements set forth in Article 3, Section 24 and Article 10, Section 1 of the Zoning Code. The act of forwarding a proposal to the Planning Commission for further review is not intended to represent, nor shall it be construed to mean that the project is approved. The approval authority over Conditional Use applicants rests with the Planning Commission.
Responding to Mr. Ruane, Mr. Jorgenson explained that there are several criteria utilized by staff to differentiate a superior residential development to that of a more traditional development. Consideration is given to mixed density, variety of housing types, requirement of 25% open space, active recreation areas of 275 sq. ft. per dwelling required, pedestrian oriented amenities, sidewalk linkages along streets, buffering, etc. Mr. Jorgenson explained that the review to be conducted by Council is to determine whether or not the concept that has been proposed is in keeping with the Comprehensive Plan and the PND section of the Code and that the Planning Commission will review specifics regarding inter-connectivity as a part of their review process if it is brought before them. Realizing that there are two (2) additional projects within this area of the community, Mr. Jorgenson felt confident that inter-connectivity will be an issue for all three (3) of the projects.
Mr. Ruane also relayed concern with having only one (1) access point for the proposed development. Responding, Mr. Jorgenson stated that there is a Design Development Review Committee, whose membership includes representatives from the fire and police departments. If there are concerns, they will be addressed during their review and the results relayed to the applicants. He assured members that staff would not compromise their position on safety issues; therefore, if access is an issue from a fire or police safety perspective, the applicant will be required to provide two (2) points of ingress and egress.
Mr. Ruane referred to the adjacent proposed projects, Patriot Village and Rojan Meadows, and questioned if consideration is given to the cumulative affect on the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan when there are three (3) projects. He noted concerns regarding the close proximity of the proposed developments to the partial interchange on North Little Creek Road and that preservation measures have been put in place for that area by the State of Delaware to preserve open space. Mr. Ruane relayed concern with the traffic impact that these developments will have and noted that representatives of DelDOT previously indicated that they were reviewing the impact of traffic off of the interchange onto the corridor; however, they were not aware of these additional developments. Although the proposed development may meet the design standards, he questioned if it would qualify under other goals and policies at this time. He suggested that the proposed project be reviewed in the context of the other two (2) projects at a later date when the Comprehensive Plan considers the entire area in order to develop an impact statement. Mr. Ruane explained that consideration of the three (3) proposed projects separately would not warrant a traffic review study; however, if they were considered at the same time, there would be a significant impact. It was his feeling that these concerns would fall under the requirement that the PND must be in accordance with other goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
Responding, Mr. Jorgenson stated that the aggregate development of the area is significant, and that consideration of such development and addressing such growth is the nature of planning. In addition to the three (3) proposed developments that are known, he anticipates further growth in this part of the community. He assured members that staff is considering growth in their review of this project, which is a considered basis for making a recommendation to Council. Staff has examined what the code prescribes, has applied those tenets, and has made a recommendation that this project, in keeping with the standards found within the code and from staff’s perspective, should be given additional consideration by the Planning Commission and encouraged members to refer the proposed project accordingly.
Concurring with Mr. Ruane, Mr. Ritter advised members that there currently is a serious traffic problem on North Little Creek Road (East Division Street), as well as the intersection on Route 13 and East Division Street. Until these traffic problems are resolved, he felt that there should be no further consideration of development in this area of the community.
Mr. Ritter moved not to refer the proposed Cartanza Farms Property Subdivision (Lexington Woods) to the Planning Commission, seconded by Mr. Ruane.
Mr. Randy Duplechain, Engineer with Davis, Bowen & Friedel, addressed members on behalf of the applicant for this project. With regards to the concerns of inter-connectivity, Mr. Duplechain stated that the initial plan included a roadway inter-connecting to an adjacent development; however, the roadway was eliminated during the pre-application review with the planning staff. He explained that the recommendation was made to avoid controversy, since the adjacent neighborhood consists of single family residences and the proposed project consists of mixed use development. Mr. Duplechain assured members that if it is desired, the inter-connecting roadway can easily be included. He also noted that two (2) access points are required for those developments with 150 or more dwelling units and that the proposed project includes 148 dwelling units. He advised members that traffic is an issue as developments occur and that DelDOT will require permits for entrances. He suggested that reestablishing an inter-connective roadway would assist with the dispersing of traffic. Mr. Duplechain stated that there has been a substantial amount of time and effort put into this project and requested that Council allow the Planning Commission the opportunity to further review the project.
In response to Mr. Ruane, Mr. Duplechain explained that the location of the entrance was chosen to align it with the Accident Potential Zone, which eliminates homes from being placed within this zone. If the project proceeds to the Planning Commission, he stated that DelDOT will be requested to review the placement of the entrance and that they may require it to be relocated.
Mr. Jorgenson reminded members that the connectivity and providing access to adjacent neighborhoods are specifics that are a part of the plan approval process of the Planning Commission. He stated that the proposed project is in a conceptual stage and that the plan submitted is a concept. He explained that consideration is given only to whether the project generally meets the type of development that the Zoning Code and the Comprehensive Plan describes for planned neighborhood development and that it is staff’s opinion that from a conceptual standpoint, the proposed project does.
Mr. Tony Ashburn, applicant, felt that the City would have welcomed the proposed project as it, in his opinion, would make substantial improvements to the area. With regards to the concerns of traffic, Mr. Ashburn stated that traffic is an issue throughout the City, as well as in other communities throughout the State, and felt that these concerns would be addressed if the project is referred to the Planning Commission for further consideration.
Mr. Speed felt it has been assumed that this area is being developed because of the partial interchange onto North Little Creek Road. He stated that there are few open space areas within the City of Dover that can be developed, which is why the City wants to review the possibility of annexation, and that this part of the community is being developed because it remains vacant. Although the partial interchange may have escalated the development of this area, it was inevitable. With regards to the concerns of traffic, most particularly at the intersection of Route 13 and North Little Creek Road, he felt confident that since this concern was brought to the attention of DelDOT officials, the problems will be resolved before the development is complete.
Mr. Speed reminded members that home ownership is a goal of the City and that new construction will impact the City’s ability to increase the percentage of home ownership. Although he agrees that Council members’ concerns are valid, he felt confident that these matters would be addressed and resolved by staff, the Planning Commission, and DelDOT. It was his opinion that the proposed project not only meets, but exceeds the requirements of the Zoning Code adopted by Council. Therefore, he felt it would be unfair if Council did not refer those projects meeting or exceeding the requirements in the beginning of the process to the Planning Commission . If the concerns are not resolved during staff’s or the Planning Commission’s review, then the project could be stopped.
Mrs. Williams moved for a call for the question, seconded by Mr. Ritter and carried with Mr. Truitt and Mr. Salters voting no.
The motion not to refer the proposed Cartanza Farms Property Subdivision (Lexington Woods) to the Planning Commission failed by a roll call vote of six (6) no, and three (3) yes (Mr. Ritter, Mr. Truitt, and Mr. Ruane).
Mr. Salters relayed concern with not allowing property owners to develop their property and allowing them the opportunity for due process. It was his feeling that if this matter is not referred to the Planning Commission, then Council would be taking away this right.
Mr. Truitt explained that his desire was to provide an opportunity for the residents in the surrounding area to relay their concerns. Since public hearings are a part of the review process, he requested that members of the Planning Commission, when considering this project, take those comments into consideration.
Mrs. Williams moved to refer the Conceptual Plan for the Cartanza Farms Property Subdivision (Lexington Woods), Planned Neighborhood Design to the Planning Commission for further review and consideration through the Conditional Use Process, as recommended by staff. The motion was seconded Mr. Speed and carried by a roll call vote of seven (7) yes, and two (2) no (Mr. Ritter and Mr. Ruane).
Mrs. Williams moved for adjournment, seconded by Mr. Speed and unanimously carried.
Meeting Adjourned at 9:24 P.M.
JANICE C. GREEN
CITY CLERK
All orders, ordinances, and resolutions adopted by City Council during their Regular Meeting of February 24, 2003, are hereby approved.
JAMES L. HUTCHISON
MAYOR
/JG
S:ClerksOfficeAgendas&MinutesCouncil-Minutes20032-24-2003.wpd
Exhibit Attached to Original Minutes and File Copy
Exhibit #1 - Letter from Mr. Steven Artz, Ph.D. dated March 4, 2003