REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
The Regular Council Meeting was held on February 11, 2002 at 7:30 p.m. with Council President McGlumphy presiding. Council members present were Mr. Ritter, Mr. Pitts, Mr. Gorman, Mr. Truitt, Mr. Carey, Mr. Speed, Mr. Salters, and Mr. Ruane.
Council staff members present were Chief Horvath, Mr. Cooper, Mr. DePrima, Mrs. Mitchell, Mr. Petit de Mange, Mrs. Green, and Deputy City Solicitor Pepper.
OPEN FORUM
The Open Forum was held at 7:15 p.m., prior to commencement of the Official Council Meeting. Council President McGlumphy declared the Open Forum in session and reminded those present that Council is not in official session and cannot take formal action.
There was no one present wishing to speak during the Open Forum.
The invocation was given by Chaplain Dixon, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance.
AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS
Mr. Gorman requested the addition of item #1A - Comments by Mayor Hutchison, item #5C - Proposed Ordinance Amendment on Bond Financing (it is noted that a First Reading, item #7, will be required), and item #5D - Report from City Planner - City Population and Census Data.
Mr. Salters moved for approval of the agenda, as amended, seconded by Mr. Speed and unanimously carried.
ADOPTION OF MINUTES - REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JANUARY 28, 2002
The Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of January 28, 2002 were unanimously approved by motion of Mr. Carey, seconded by Mr. Speed and bore the written approval of Mayor Hutchison.
COMMENTS BY MAYOR HUTCHISON - RECENT ARRESTS BY DOVER POLICE DEPARTMENT
Mayor Hutchison advised members of recent arrests made by the Dover Police Department which resulted in a substantial amount of drugs being taken off our City streets. He assured members that the City of Dover Police Department continues to be pro-active in the war on drugs and that they will continue to work with the State Police and other municipalities to eradicate this problem. Mayor Hutchison relayed his appreciation to the Police Department for an outstanding job.
PUBLIC HEARING/FINAL READING - PROPOSED ORDINANCE - ESTABLISHMENT OF HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION
A public hearing was duly advertised for this time and place to consider approval of a proposed ordinance amendment to create a Human Relations Commission.
Council President McGlumphy declared the hearing open.
Mr. Charles Weller, 241 Fiddlers Green, relayed his support for the proposed ordinance and urged its adoption.
Ms. Juana Fuentes-Bowles, 231 N. Ann Avenue - Director of the State Human Relations Office, applauded members of Council and Mayor Hutchison for their commitment to this project and for their understanding of its importance. She noted that all citizens of the City will benefit from this commission and that the State Human Relations Commission will serve as a resource and provide guidance as the City moves forward. Ms. Fuentes-Bowles also relayed appreciation to the Harmony Group who assisted in the fruition of this ordinance as well as the other projects that have been instituted.
Mr. Cecil Wilson, 130 Brandywine Drive - President of the NAACP Central Delaware Branch, commended all those who participated in this endeavor and assured members that the NAACP is available to work with the City.
Mr. Jim Brooks, 17 Maple Lane - Diversity Officer for the Department of Corrections for the State of Delaware, stated that he was elated to see that the City of Dover has decided to move forward in the area of diversity and for the inclusion of all its citizens. He relayed appreciation for the Mayor and Council and all those involved who have made a statement by establishing this commission.
Bishop Marion Lott, 218 Reed Street - President of the Concerned Clergy and Citizen Coalition, relayed his support for the proposed ordinance as it is pro-active and inclusive. He also felt that it will allow all citizens of Dover to be heard and provides them access to a portion of government that is available for the people and by the people.
Council President McGlumphy declared the hearing closed.
Mr. Carey moved that the final reading of the proposed ordinance be acknowledged by title only, seconded by Mr. Speed and unanimously carried (the first reading of this ordinance was accomplished during the Council Meeting of January 28, 2002).
Mr. Ruane moved for adoption of the following ordinance, seconded by Mr. Salters and carried by a unanimous roll call vote:
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET:
That Chapter 2 - Administration, Article I - In General of the Dover Code be amended by creating a new Division 6, entitled “Human Relations Commission, to read as follows, and that the ensuing sections be renumbered accordingly:
DIVISION 6. HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION
Section 2-16. Purpose.
The City Council has deemed it to be in the best interest of the City to establish a Human Relations Commission to include members who are broadly representative of the entire community and who are committed to a philosophy of inclusion, intergroup cooperation, and fair treatment that will effectively help the City meet the following needs:
a)to promote and develop an environment of fairness and respect among its citizens;
b)to develop ways to measure and monitor community relations, particularly those that are sources of intergroup conflict;
c)to involve all segments of the community in understanding and appreciating the benefits of positive inter-group relations;
d)to offer a range of programs and services that will help its residents and neighborhoods prevent and resolve issues of human relations; and
e)to develop ways of anticipating, preparing for, and relieving community tensions arising from intergroup conflict.
Section 2-17. Establishment; appointment; composition; terms of office; vacancies.
(a) There is hereby established an advisory commission to be known as "the City of Dover Human Relations Commission" to carry out the objectives as described in Chapter 2, Article I, Division 6 of this Code.
(b) The commission shall consist of fifteen (15) members, all residents of the city. Five (5) of these members shall be appointed by the mayor and confirmed by city council. Ten (10) of these members shall be appointed by the President of the Council based upon recommendations from the Council and confirmed by the Council.
(c) In selecting the membership of the commission, the Mayor and President of the Council and the council shall take particular care to ensure that the commission is broadly representative of racial, religious, gender and ethnic groups residing in the city.
(d) No member of the commission shall hold any elected or appointed office under the government of the United States or the state, county, or city, or be a candidate for any such office. The mayor, or the City Council President may remove members of the commission with the concurrence of city council, for substantial neglect of duty, or gross misconduct in office.
(e) A member of the commission shall be appointed for a term of office of three years and until his successor has been appointed and has qualified, except that one third of the initial appointees shall be appointed for terms of office of one, two (2), three (3) years, respectively, and until their successors have been appointed. When a vacancy occurs in the membership of the commission, it shall be filled by appointment for the unexpired portion of the term in the same manner as the original appointments.
(f) Members may be reappointed.
Section 2-18. Rules of procedure; compensation; legal counsel
(a) The commission shall annually elect its own chairperson to preside over its meetings, and may create and fill such other offices and committees among its members as may be found necessary and proper for its effective organization.
(b) A majority of the membership of the commission shall constitute a quorum and, if a quorum is present, a vacancy on the commission shall not impair the right of the remaining members to exercise all the powers of the commission.
(c) The commission shall hold such meetings as may be deemed necessary for the completion of its purposes, responsibilities and functions. Regular meetings shall be held at least once per month unless there is no business to be considered by the commission. Special meetings may be called by the chairperson or by three (3) members of the commission.
(d) The commission is also authorized to adopt rules of procedure for the conduct of its meetings.
(e) The commission shall not involve itself in activities or functions already assigned by law or decree to other governmental bodies.
(f) The commission may enter into agreements and build partnerships with other entities and organizations for the purpose of more efficiently and effectively carrying out its responsibilities.
(g) Members of the commission shall receive no compensation.
(h) The city solicitor shall provide legal counsel to the commission and shall be the legal representative of the commission in connection with its duties hereunder, on a case by case basis, or determine that outside counsel is needed and obtain such outside counsel for a particular matter.
(i) The commission shall make such reports to the Mayor and City Council as shall be periodically necessary. An annual report of its accomplishments and a summary of its recommendations, as appropriate, shall be sent to the Mayor and the City Council.
Section 2-19. Expenses.
(a) The City Council may appropriate a budget for the City of Dover Human Relations Commission to provide for necessary expenses and expenditures.
(b) The commission may also receive funding from other governmental, philanthropic or private organizations for the exclusive purpose of carrying out its responsibilities.
Section 2-20. Conflicts of Interest.
(a) If any member of the Human Relations Commission concludes that he or she has a conflict of interest with respect to a matter which is pending before the commission, that member shall disqualify himself or herself from participating in any deliberations, discussions and decision making processes of the commission.
Section 2-21. Powers and duties of the Human Relations Commission.
The powers and duties of the Human Relations commission shall be to:
(a) Review City programs, activities, functions and ordinances; and, make recommendations to the City Council for new, amended or changed programs, functions, activities or ordinances which would support inclusiveness and civility among Dover residents and enhance communication and understanding among residents of Dover.
(b) Inquire into incidents of inter-group conflicts and disputes within the city and to take such action as may be designed to alleviate such conflicts and disputes.
(c) Promote and encourage communications between and cooperation of all groups interested in bettering human relations in the city.
(d) Seek the active assistance of the State Human Relations Commission in the solution of complaints of alleged discrimination which fall within the jurisdiction of the State commission.
(e) Engage in such research, education and advocacy as in the judgment of the Commission or the City Council may be needed to improve human relations in the city.
(f) Develop and maintain programs that build positive relations among communities and enhance problem-solving skills among residents throughout Dover.
(g) Do all other acts and deeds necessary and proper to carry out and accomplish effectively the objectives, functions and services contemplated by the provisions of this Division.
ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 11, 2002
Mr. Ruane noted the many individuals who participated in this endeavor and relayed appreciation for their tremendous efforts. He stated that those that are interested in serving as a member of the Human Relations Commission for the City of Dover should submit their letter of intent, along with a resume, to the City Clerk’s Office and that these resumes will be accepted through February 25, 2002.
PUBLIC HEARING/FINAL READING - REZONING OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 104, 106, AND 128 SAULSBURY ROAD, OWNED BY EDWARD J. TROISE, SR.
A public hearing was duly advertised for this time and place to consider rezoning of property located 104, 106, and 128 Saulsbury Road, owned by Edward J. Troise, Sr. The property is currently zoned C-3 (Service Commercial) and the proposed zoning is I-O (Institutional and Office).
Planner's Review
The present zoning of C-3 permits service establishments, wholesale and warehousing, bowling alleys, animal hospitals, motor vehicle, boat and farm equipment sales and service, motor vehicle service stations subject to conditions, manufacturing with less than 25 employees, and printing establishments, and conditionally permits planned senior housing developments. The property is currently used for a contractor’s office, shop and apartment.
The proposed zoning of I-O permits business, professional, and governmental offices, public and institutional uses, and restaurants, and conditionally permits planned senior housing developments, fire arm ranges, correctional facilities, and public incinerators. The proposed use of the property is for a charter school.
The Planning Commission recommended approval of the rezoning. In taking this position, the Commission considered the following points:
Surrounding Land Uses: The subject property fronts on the westerly side of Saulsbury Road. Along the southerly and southwesterly perimeter, this property adjoins lands zoned I-O which include property associated with the Faith Elementary School immediately south of the subject property, Dover Elks Lodge and Modern Maturity Center. The westerly perimeter adjoins two (2) residential lots zoned R-8 (One Family Residence) which are in the Bicentennial Village subdivision. Immediately to the north are lands zoned RM-2 (Medium Density Residential) which is the location of Green Meadows Assisted Living Facility. North of Green Meadows are vacant lands zoned R-8 which is the proposed future location of a new Elks Lodge. Further north are lands zoned R-8 and C-PO (Commercial/Professional Office) which are under development as the Four Seasons Residential subdivision and professional office center. To the east, across Saulsbury Road, are lands zoned C-3 which is the location of the Super Soda Center and Fuel Service Station. To the southeast are lands zoned RG-1 (General Residence), C-PO and R-GO (General Residence & Office) which include a few single family homes, professional office uses and the future location of an approved dental office building. To the northeast are lands zoned IPM (Industrial Park Manufacturing) which include a few single family dwellings, the Blood Bank of Delaware, Dover Federal Credit Union and Playtex Family Products. Further to the east are lands zoned I-O which comprise the William Henry Middle School and Booker T. Washington Elementary School complex.
Comprehensive Plan: The Comprehensive Plan recommends that the subject property be utilized for Institutional, Industrial and Public Utility purposes.
Other Considerations: The subject property is also situated within the Corridor Overlay Zone (COZ-1) which sets forth specific site design and landscape requirements intended to foster a superior streetscape and pedestrian oriented transportation corridor.
Recommendation of Planning Staff: The Planning staff recommended that this rezoning request be approved. The proposed rezoning to I-O represents an extension of a large area of I-O zoned property that adjoins the subject property on the southerly side. The proposed I-O zoning would eliminate a piece of C-3 zoning that is situated between two institutional uses with Green Meadows Assisted Living Facility to the north and Faith Elementary School to the south. The current C-3 zoning has the potential for introducing uses that would be incompatible with these adjoining uses institutional uses, such as automobile, boat and large equipment sales and service, gas stations, dry cleaning plants and bowling alleys. Rezoning the property to I-O will ensure that a more compatible land use would occupy this property when it is redeveloped.
Further, the Comprehensive Plan supports this request in that the northerly half of the subject property that is vacant and which adjoins Green Meadows Assisted Living Facility, is designated for institutional uses. The only reason that a narrow strip of land designated for Industrial and Public Utility uses appears on the Comprehensive Plan was because the site was previously in active use as a contractor’s office and storage yard facility. This rezoning would eliminate the contractor’s storage yard use from the premises.
Correspondence
No correspondence was received on the proposed rezoning.
Public Hearing
Council President McGlumphy declared the hearing open.
Mr. Constance Malmberg, 502 S. State Street, addressed members as the attorney representing the applicant and requested that the matter be deferred until March 11, 2002 with the understanding that the costs for re-advertising the public hearing to be at the applicant’s expense. The request for deferment is due to technical contract issues; however, he assured members that it is the applicant’s intent to move forward with the project.
Mr. Carey moved to defer the public hearing and final action on the rezoning request until the Regular Council Meeting on March 11, 2002 at 7:30 p.m. The motion was seconded by Mr. Ruane and unanimously carried.
Council President McGlumphy declared the hearing deferred until the Regular Council Meeting on March 11, 2002 at 7:30 p.m.
UTILITY COMMITTEE REPORT
The Utility Committee met on January 28, 2002 with Chairman Ruane presiding.
Presentation - Update on Street Program Improvements - Financial and Implementation Schedule
During the Utility Committee meeting of September 10, 2001, members were provided an opportunity to discuss the Street Program Overview and 2001/2002 Capital Program, which included detailed information on Street Inventory, Street Program, Revenue Resources, and the 2001/2002 Capital Program.
Mr. Koenig, Public Works Director, distributed details and reviewed the 2001 Street Program with members and noted that a more detailed Power Point Presentation of the program will be conducted in early July 2002.
The committee recommended acceptance of the 2001 Street Program Review as presented by staff.
Mr. Ruane moved for approval of the committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Speed and unanimously carried.
Mr. Ruane moved for acceptance of the Utility Committee Report, seconded by Mr. Speed and unanimously carried.
LEGISLATIVE AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT
The Legislative and Finance Committee met on January 28, 2002 with Chairman Gorman presiding.
Proposed Increase in Reconnect Fees
The City of Dover charges a fee for those customers who have their electric services reconnected after they have been cut for non-payment. A review of the City’s fee structure indicates that the current fees do not cover the costs for providing reconnect services, particularly after regular work hours when on-call personnel must perform the reconnects. The review also indicates that the City’s current reconnect fee of $35, regardless of the time of day, is substantially lower than those of other utilities. The current rate was established by City Council on September 27, 1993. Records indicate an average of 660 cutoffs each month.
Staff provided members with fee structures from neighboring utilities (Conectiv and Delaware Electric Co-op) which were significantly higher and recommended that the Electric Service Handbook, Division II, Section 6, be amended by adding Section 6(c) as follows:
The reconnect fee shall be $50 from 8:00 A.M. - 9:00 P.M., Monday - Friday and $100 Monday - Friday from 9:00 P.M. - 8:00 A.M., Weekends and Holidays.
Members were assured that the $100 reconnect fee will not affect the majority of the customers since most realize that their service has been cut and contact the City to have to have their electric reconnected between the hours of 5:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m.
The committee recommended the addition of Section 6(c) to the Electric Service Handbook, as recommended by staff.
Mr. Gorman moved for approval of the committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Ruane.
Feeling that the reconnect fee in the amount of $100 for after-hours was too high, Mr. Salters moved to amend the rate from $100 to $75. The motion was seconded by Mr. Carey.
Mr. Speed referred to the many alternatives provided to our customers who have difficulty making their payments and that the City is very flexible in this matter. The $100 fee is specifically for those reconnects requested at unusual hours. It was his feeling that the amount serves as a deterrent and needs to remain at a level to discourage reconnects at those times.
Mr. Ritter relayed his concern with the proposed increases, feeling that it will only provide an increased burden on the citizens of Dover that may have simply forgotten to pay their bill or are experiencing financial difficulties that month and are hesitant to seek assistance, feeling that they will have the required money before being cut for non-payment. In these situations, it will be difficult for individuals to pay an additional fee. With the recent Council action that eliminated the fuel adjustment credit, he stated that the City continues to add financial burdens to the citizens of Dover.
Mr. Ruane noted the deficit that has resulted from the City’s current system, the very lengthy program involved before a citizen is disconnected, and the fact that the City does not currently charge first-time offenders. Considering the many alternatives that are offered to the residents, he relayed opposition to the amendment to decrease the fee to $75.
Mr. Ritter questioned why the City considers a payment late after 35 days when most other utility companies have a 45 day period. Responding, Mr. DePrima stated that staff would research this matter for a report back to the committee.
On a call for the question by Mr. Ruane, the motion to amend the reconnect fee from $100 to $75 for after-hours failed by a roll call vote of six (6) no, and three (3) yes (Mr. Truitt, Mr. Carey, and Mr. Salters).
The motion to amend Division II, Section 6, of the Electric Service Handbook, by adding Section 6(c) to read as follows:
The reconnect fee shall be $50 from 8:00 A.M. - 9:00 P.M., Monday - Friday and $100 Monday - Friday from 9:00 P.M. - 8:00 A.M., Weekends and Holidays
was carried by a roll call vote of six (6) yes, three (3) no (Mr. Ritter, Mr. Carey, and Mr. Salters).
Bid - Request to Purchase Video Cameras with Full Installation at Critical Utility Sites
In order to provide security at the City’s eight (8) most critical utility sites (electric and water), it has become necessary to equip these sites with video camera protection. All cameras will be connected through the City’s fiber optic system and will be continuously monitored at the Systems Operation Center located at the Electric Administration Building. For security reasons, the eight (8) locations will be not disclosed. Bids were solicited for the purchase and installation of video cameras.
Staff recommended awarding the bid to the low bidder, Delaware Electric Signal, in the amount of $20,500 for the purchase and installation of video cameras..
The committee recommended approval of staff’s recommendation, with the understanding that the cost will be prorated proportionally between the Electric and Public Works Departments.
Mr. Gorman moved for approval of the committee’s recommendation to award the bid for the purchase and installation of video cameras to the low bidder, Delaware Electric Signal, in the amount of $20,500, with the understanding that the cost will be prorated proportionally between the Electric and Public Works Departments. The motion was seconded by Mr. Speed and carried by a unanimous roll call vote.
Proposed Ordinance Amendment - Bond Financing Approval (Chapter 2, Article XI, Section 2-216 of the Dover Code)
During the committee meeting held earlier this afternoon, members considered a proposed ordinance amendment that would mandate bond issuers to seek and gain the approval of the City of Dover for properties that are located within the corporate limits of the City of Dover. During the Regular Council Meeting of January 14, 2002, the Deputy City Solicitor reported that the agreement between Kent County and The Capital Trust Agency was found to be proper with regards to the sale of the Mayfair Apartments, explaining that the applicable law requires only the consent of one (1) jurisdiction and that the County’s agreement is sufficient for the purposes of the applicable laws.
In an attempt to avoid this type of situation from occurring in the future, at the suggestion of Mr. Ruane, City Solicitor Rodriguez drafted an ordinance which will amend Chapter 2 of the Dover Code by creating a new Article XI, Section 2-216 - Bond Financing Approval.
The committee recommended adoption of the proposed ordinance as prepared by the City Solicitor.
Mr. Ruane moved for approval of the committee’s recommendation for adoption of an ordinance amending Chapter 2 of the Dover Code by creating a new Article XI, Section 2-216 - Bond Financing Approval. The motion was seconded by Mr. Carey and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Ritter abstained). (The First Reading of the ordinance will take place during the latter part of the meeting).
Report from City Planner - City Population and Census Data
During the committee meeting held earlier this afternoon, members reviewed a report provided by the City Planner regarding the City population and census data. Members were reminded that during their Regular Meeting of December 10, 2001, Council referred the proposed redistricting plan to the Planning Department to verify the authenticity of the population numbers, and that the Mayor and City Manager hold a meeting with the NAACP to reevaluate the terms of the Consent Order for a report back to the Legislative and Finance Committee for their review.
Mr. Petit de Mange advised members that the Planning staff performed a review and analysis of the 2000 Census Block Data for the purpose of detecting possible anomalies and irregularities with the 2000 census data that was published by the U.S. Census Bureau. As a result, he provided members a report prepared by the Planning Department titled 2000 Census: A Review of Census Block Data For Dover, Delaware depicting the 34 block area discrepancies. Mr. Petit de Mange indicated that there are a total of 542 census blocks in the City of Dover and, of those, there were 34 blocks depicting significant errors. The U.S. Census Bureau offers a process for review and correction of certain elements of the 2000 Census. The Count Question Resolution Process, as it is termed, will investigate three (3) types of alleged errors upon request: 1) Geopolitical Boundary Errors; 2) Geo-coding Errors; and 3) Housing Unit & Group Quarters Count Errors. These are the only areas that can be challenged and may be corrected by the U.S. Census Bureau. Due to the backlog of requests, corrections by the U.S. Census Bureau will take approximately 90 to 120 days to process.
Mr. Gorman stated that a meeting was held with representatives of the NAACP in an effort to reevaluate the terms of the Consent Order. At this time, the NAACP was not willing to consider reducing the required 65% black population in the Fourth District (which is currently at 63%).
Noting that the re-alignment of the Council Districts must be complete prior to May 1, 2002 to become effective for the April 2003 Municipal Election, Mr. Gorman suggested that there by two (2) separate motions for action to occur simultaneously in order to act in a proactive manner regarding this issue.
The committee recommended that the Planning Department pursue corrective action through the Count Question Resolution process for the various census blocks that have been identified as having a high probability of error.
The committee also recommended that the Election Board be directed to take the necessary actions to adjust the Fourth District boundaries in order for the City to be in compliance with the NAACP Consent Order by utilizing the 2000 Census and giving consideration of the errors in the data, while keeping the remaining Council districts intact.
Mr. Gorman moved to authorize the City Planner to move forward with submitting the corrected population numbers to the Census Bureau for amending, as recommended by the committee. The motion was seconded by Mr. Ruane and unanimously carried (Mr. Pitts abstained).
Considering the length of time that there may be for the Census Bureau to make the necessary adjustments and the deadline of May 1st for the development of new Council Districts, Mr. Gorman moved to re-commission the Election Board to readjust the Fourth Council District, utilizing the 2000 Census Data, so that no current members of Council are in contention for the 2003 City Election, while maintaining the integrity of the 65% requirement of the Consent Decree. The motion was seconded by Mr. Salters.
Mr. Ritter felt that the Election Board has served its purpose and suggested that at this time, members of Council work on the development of new Council Districts.
On a call for the question by Mr. Salters, the motion to re-commission the Election Board to readjust the Fourth Council District, utilizing the 2000 Census Data, so that no current members of Council are in contention for the 2003 City Election, while maintaining the integrity of the 65% requirement of the Consent Decree was carried by a roll call vote of six (6) yes and two (2) no (Mr. Ritter and Mr. Speed) (Mr. Pitts abstained).
Mr. Gorman moved for acceptance of the Legislative and Finance Committee Report, seconded by Mr. Salters and unanimously carried.
DEDICATION TO REVEREND RUDOLPH COLEMAN - REQUEST FOR NAMING CIRCLE IN FRONT OF TRAIN STATION (COUNCILMAN SALTERS)
Mr. Salters requested that members consider dedicating the traffic circle to be located in front on the Train Station in downtown Dover and naming it after Reverend Rudolph Wesley Coleman. Since this traffic circle is in the planning stages, with Council’s approval, this recommendation will be forwarded to the appropriate agencies to be considered along with the development plans.
Mr. Salters moved to dedicate the traffic circle to be located in front of the Train Station in downtown Dover and naming it after Reverend Rudolph Wesley Coleman, seconded by Mr. Ruane.
Responding to Mr. Speed, Mr. Salters indicated that the traffic circle is a State project currently underway and that the dedication would not require the expenditure of any City funds.
Ms. Clara Washington, 120 Reese Street, explained to members that, although she was devoted to Reverend Coleman as a leader, there is concern in the community that there are other citizens of the City that are deserving of such recognition as well.
Mr. Pitts moved to table action until the Council Meeting of March 11, 2002, to allow members the opportunity to obtain the community’s support for the dedication. The motion was seconded by Mr. Truitt and carried by a unanimous roll call vote.
FIRST READING - PROPOSED ORDINANCE
Mr. Ruane moved to waive the reading of the proposed ordinance before Council, seconded by Mr. Speed and unanimously carried. Council President McGlumphy reminded the public that copies of the proposed ordinance are available at the entrance of the Council Chambers or can be obtained from the City Clerk's Office. Final action by Council on the proposed ordinance will take place during the Council Meeting of February 25, 2002.
Mr. Salters moved for acknowledgment of the first reading of the following proposed ordinance, by title only, seconded by Mr. Speed and unanimously carried:
Chapter 2 - Administration, Article XI - Bond Financing Approval, Section 2-216
Mr. Carey moved for adjournment, seconded by Mr. Gorman and unanimously carried.
Meeting Adjourned at 8:49 P.M.
JANICE C. GREEN
CITY CLERK
All orders, ordinances and resolutions adopted by City Council during their meeting of February 11, 2002, are hereby approved.
JAMES L. HUTCHISON
MAYOR
/JG
S:\ClerksOffice\Agendas&Minutes\Council-Minutes\2002\02-11-2002.wpd