REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
The Regular Council Meeting was held on September 8, 1997 at 7:30 p.m. with Council President Christiansen presiding. Council members present were Mr. Lambert, Mr. Pitts, Mr. Leary, Mr. Truitt, Mrs. Malone, Mr. Salters and Mr. Weller. Mr. Fenimore was absent.
Council staff members present were Chief Faulkner, Mr. Lucas, Mr. O'Connor, Mr. DePrima, Chief Carey, Mrs. Boaman and Mr. Rodriguez.
OPEN FORUM
The Open Forum was held at 7:15 p.m., prior to commencement of the Official Council Meeting. Council President Christiansen declared the open forum in session and reminded those present that Council is not in official session and cannot take formal action.
Mr. Eugene Ruane of 122 Shadow Court addressed members of Council. Mr. Ruane relayed that in his role as President of the Crossgates/Mayfair/Wedgwood/Mayfair II Civic Association, he became involved in a planning issue that required him to obtain information from the City Clerk’s Office and the Planning Office. He wished to relay to Council that staff from both departments were very helpful and informative and he commended the City for the level of service they provide to the public. Mr. Ruane offered a suggestion that he feels may be helpful to the public relative to proposed rezonings. In the notice that is sent out to property owners informing them of the proposed rezoning, Mr. Ruane suggested that an explanation be given as to the types of uses permitted in the requested zoning classification. He explained that the current notice is limited to an announcement of the requested zone. Since the public has limited knowledge of uses permitted within each zoning classification, Mr. Ruane felt that a summary paragraph explaining the permitted uses within the requested zoning classification would be very helpful to the general public.
Council President Christiansen thanked Mr. Ruane for his suggestion and stated that City staff will review the matter.
The invocation was given by Pastor Eldon Fowler, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance.
AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS
Mrs. Malone moved for approval of the agenda, seconded by Mr. Salters and unanimously carried.
ADOPTION OF MINUTES - REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 25, 1997
The Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of August 25, 1997 were unanimously approved by motion of Mrs. Malone, seconded by Mr. Leary and bore the written approval of Mayor Hutchison.
PROCLAMATIONS
Thunder in Dover Day
The City Clerk read into the record the following Proclamation:
WHEREAS, Dover Downs International Speedway is regarded as one of the leading motor sports facilities in the nation; and
WHEREAS, the NASCAR events at Dover Downs attract the largest crowds of any sporting event in the Mid-Atlantic Region; and
WHEREAS, NASCAR racing at Dover Downs contributes over 40 million dollars per year to the economy of Kent County; and
WHEREAS, the attention of millions of race fans is focused on Delaware twice each year through television and press coverage of NASCAR racing at Dover Downs; and
WHEREAS, the City of Dover is the Capitol of the First State and home of Dover Downs International Speedway; and
WHEREAS, a festival will be held in downtown Dover called “Thunder in Dover” to salute the NASCAR races and showcase our City.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, JAMES L. HUTCHISON, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF DOVER, do hereby proclaim Thursday, September 18, 1997 as “THUNDER IN DOVER DAY” in the City of Dover and urge all citizens to join in the festivities.
The Proclamation was presented by Mayor Hutchison to Mary Skelton, Director of Kent County Tourism and Mary Wagner, Chairman of Special Events for Kent County Tourism. Ms. Skelton stated one of the purposes of this event is to lengthen the stay of our fans, which contributes to the economy of many businesses such as hotels, restaurants and retail establishments. In addition, it was felt that bringing some of the activities into downtown Dover would benefit the downtown area as well as provide an opportunity to showcase the historic parts of Dover and Kent County.
A schedule of events was distributed to members of Council and Ms. Skelton invited Mayor Hutchison and members of Council to be her guest at the luncheon scheduled for Thursday, September 18th.
Kids Day America/International
The City Clerk read into the record the following Proclamation:
WHEREAS, the health and well-being of children is our responsibility; and
WHEREAS, the safety of our children is a significant concern for parents, community leaders and health care givers; and
WHEREAS, environmental welfare is of universal concern and deserves the utmost attention; and
WHEREAS, if started in childhood, proper health, safety and environmental habits can be maintained for a lifetime, producing a valued member of society, and enhancing our community.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, JAMES L. HUTCHISON, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF DOVER, do hereby proclaim September 20, 1997 as “KIDS DAY AMERICA/INTERNATIONAL” in the City of Dover and urge that this day be dedicated to the efforts of Doctors of Chiropractic in helping educate all citizens on the importance of health, safety and environmental issues affecting our community.
Constitution Week
The City Clerk read into the record the following Proclamation:
WHEREAS, our Founding Fathers, in order to secure the blessings of liberty for themselves and their posterity, did ordain and establish a Constitution for the United States of America; and
WHEREAS, it is of the greatest importance that all citizens fully understand the provisions and principles contained in the Constitution in order to effectively support, preserve and defend it against all enemies; and
WHEREAS, the two hundred tenth anniversary of the signing of the Constitution provides an historic opportunity for all Americans to remember the achievements of the framers of the Constitution and the rights, privileges, and responsibilities they afforded us in this unique document; and
WHEREAS, the independence guaranteed to American citizens, whether by birth or naturalization, should be celebrated by appropriate ceremonies and activities during Constitution Week, September 17 through September 23, as designated by proclamation of the President of the United States of America in accordance with Public Law 915.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, JAMES L. HUTCHISON, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF DOVER, do hereby proclaim the week of September 17, 1997 through September 23, 1997 as "CONSTITUTION WEEK" in the City of Dover, and urge all citizens to reflect during that week on the many benefits of our Federal Constitution and the privileges and responsibilities of American citizenship.
The Proclamation was presented by Mayor Hutchison to Caroline Abbott, representing the Daughters of the American Resolution.
PUBLIC HEARING/FINAL READING - REZONING - 1427 NEW BURTON ROAD - RONALD L. AND JANET L. HARMON
A public hearing was duly advertised for this time and place to consider rezoning of property located at 1427 New Burton Road, owned by Ronald L. and Janet L. Harmon.
Planner's Review
The City Planner reported that with five (5) members voting for and three (3) members voting against, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the requested rezoning. In taking this position the Commissioners considered the following points:
Surrounding Land Uses - Northwest of the property and along New Burton Road are single family homes zoned R-8. To the northeast and along New Burton Road are two commercial properties. One is zoned C-1 (Neighborhood Commercial) and is the location of the Peppermill Pantry, owned by the applicant, and the second is zoned C-1A (Limited Commercial) and it is the location of the Dolphin Seafood Restaurant and Seafood Market. To the east are homes in the Wedgwood Development zoned R-8. To the south are properties fronting on Webbs Lane. There are two homes zoned R-8 and four properties zoned a variety of commercial zones including C-1, C-1A, and C-3. Most of the commercial property is associated with the offices and print shop of the Independent Newspapers Inc.
The Comprehensive Plan designates this area for low density residential. If this property should be rezoned so that it does not conform with the plan, then the zoning may revert back to R-8 within one year of the rezoning if construction on the site is not begun.
Due to its elevation, providing sewer and stormwater management to the site is cost prohibitive for low density residential development. Therefore, the owner proposed a small mini-warehouse complex which would not require sewers.
Because this proposal is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and not completely compatible with the surrounding residential homes, the City Planner did not support the proposal, but acknowledged that this is a difficult site to develop because of its elevation, and that the southeast area adjacent to the Independent Newspaper property is not very desirable for residential development. The City Planner noted that while a small mini-warehouse project may not have a significant impact on neighboring homes, once this property is rezoned to C-3 (Service Commercial) any of the permitted uses can, within one year, submit an application for a Site Plan development. The City Planner stated that if neighboring property owners are supportive of this application, and if the Commission feels that the development of some other C-3 (Service Commercial) uses are unlikely to be developed, then a recommendation to approve may be warranted.
Mr. Lambert stated that during his discussions with neighboring property owners, many voiced concerns that if the rezoning is denied, then the property owner will use the land to construct low cost housing or an apartment complex. He asked if the property is currently zoned for such uses. Mr. DePrima stated that under the current Neighborhood Design Option, this would not be a possibility since it does not meet the minimum acreage standards. It would, however, qualify for senior housing apartments in accordance with newly adopted ordinances.
Correspondence
The City Clerk reported that a petition in opposition of the rezoning was received on August 20, 1997, containing signatures of owners from 14 homes. In accordance with a report from the City Assessor, the percentage of total area protesting the rezoning was 41.05%. In accordance with 22 Delaware Code Section 305, since more than 20% of the permitted area protested, approval of the zoning amendment requires a three-fourths vote of the legislative body. However, on September 8, 1997, letters were received from five of the homeowners that signed the original petition requesting that their names be removed from the petition. Based on that latest information, the City Assessor has determined that the remaining protestors now equals 16.25% of the total area protesting the rezoning. Since this is less than the required 20% to mandate a three-fourths vote, approval of the zoning amendment will require a majority vote of the legislative body.
Mrs. Boaman also relayed that a letter was received from Veronica A. Cerny in opposition of the proposed rezoning.
Public Hearing
Council President Christiansen declared the hearing open.
Mr. Ron Harmon stated that he and his wife have owned the property for over 20 years. He explained some of the problems he has encountered in trying to develop the land. The sanitary sewer that is available is not deep enough to provide gravity sewer and according to Gerald Donovan Associates, the best solution would be to provide a small lift station at an estimated cost of $10,000. In order to meet the requirements for a stormwater detention basin, one residential lot would be lost due to the size requirements of the pond. After discussions with City Planning staff on all requirements, it was determined that after needed land area for utilities, there would only be enough remaining land for five building lots. With only five building lots, the cost of the lift station and other utilities and roadway improvements required for the subdivision, the project for single family homes is not financially feasible. This is the reason that he pursued other possible uses for the land. Mr. Harmon explained that he did not specifically request a C-3 zoning classification, but was informed by the Planning staff that the C-3 classification was needed for use as a mini-storage facility.
Mr. Harmon explained that he and his wife live on this site and also have a retail business (Peppermill Pantry) that is adjacent to the property being rezoned. They do not plan on relocating and he assured the public that he would not propose a use for the property that he felt would be intrusive to his home or to his neighbors. He acknowledged that most of his neighbors do not object to the proposal for a mini-storage facility, but rather object to other allowable uses in the C-3 zoning category. He stated that the mini-storage facility will be screened and that there is insufficient land area for additional development. They plan to maintain a tree buffer between properties, have low level lighting and allow no access by renters after 10:00 p.m. Mr. Harmon pledged that if the proposal for the mini-storage facility does not come to fruition, he will allow the property to revert to its current R-8 zoning classification. He also stated that if, in the future, the City should see fit to permit mini-storage facilities in more restrictive zones, he will be more than happy to zone his property to the more restrictive zone at that time. Mr. Harmon reiterated that his neighbors have relayed to him that they have no objections to the proposal for a mini-storage facility but they are concerned with the other types of uses that are permitted in the C-3 zone. He suggested that in the future, the City should reconsider the zoning classification for mini-storage facilities so that they may be placed in more restrictive zones.
Asked by Mr. Salters if the City could place limitations on the specific type of uses permitted in the C-3 zone, Solicitor Rodriquez stated the City cannot legally grant conditional approval.
Mrs. Malone asked how many units are planned and if there would be an on-site manager for the facility. Mr. Harmon stated that he plans to have between 120 and 130 units. Since he lives on the property, he and his wife will be the full-time managers. Mrs. Harmon and her employees at the Peppermill Pantry will manage the facility while Mr. Harmon works. He plans to retire within the next 1½ years, at which time he will manage it on a full-time basis.
Mr. Ben Bowings of 198 Haman Drive voiced his support for the requested rezoning. He stated that the property is shielded from the view of most of the surrounding property owners by tall trees. Mr. Bowings stated that Mr. Harmon is entitled to the use of his land as long as it is not a burden on the other property owners. He stated his opinion that a mini-storage facility would be a less intrusive use than a residential development. In conversations with other property owners, Mr. Bowings stated that no one voiced objections once they understood the proposal.
Mr. James Howlett of 1431 New Burton Road voiced his objection to the proposed rezoning. He stated that his objections are to the C-3 zoning classification, stating that the neighbors have no guarantee that the mini-storage facility will actually come to fruition, noting that many more uses are permitted in the commercial zone. Mr. Howlett stated that when he bought his property, the surrounding properties were zoned residential and he believed that it was generally a residential area. Rezoning the property benefits no one but Mr. Harmon. He stated that he does not object to Mr. Harmon developing the land, but that the permitted use of the land should not be at the expense of the surrounding property owners. Referring to the traffic on New Burton Road, Mr. Howlett stated that this is already a very busy road and urged members of Council to take this into consideration when voting on the rezoning.
Mr. Eugene Ruane of 122 Shadow Court stated that he is the President of the Crossgates/Mayfair/ Wedgwood/Mayfair II Civic Association. However, he explained that his position is not the result of a vote of the organization but is the result of conversations with as many neighbors as he had time to contact. He voiced his objections to the proposed rezoning, reiterating Mr. Howlett’s concerns of the C-3 zoning classification. He reminded Council that this is a rezoning hearing, not a site plan hearing. The question before Council is if C-3 is the best zoning classification for this property. Referring to the petition and to those that have switched their positions, Mr. Ruane stated that people seem to be confused due to a lack of information on the proposal. He reminded Council, however, that objections of seven property owners still remain on the petition.
After many public hearings and as the result of suggestions from the public, City Council adopted a new Comprehensive Plan in June 1996. During the workshops, the owner did not come forward to recommend a different zone. Therefore, the request for commercial zoning is not in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Referring to the concept for a small mini-storage facility, Mr. Ruane stated that the proposal for up to 130 units is not a small facility. As to the proposal for an entrance on New Burton Road, Mr. Ruane stated that the traffic is already hazardous. The proposal for a mini-storage facility has the potential for a significant increase in traffic. He also stressed concern with lighting for the facility intruding on the adjacent residential properties.
Mr. Ruane stated that City Council should not be concerned with how much profit a property owner can make but should be concerned only with the best use of the property. A property zoned commercial is more valuable than one zoned residential and if permitted, everyone would request commercial zoning which explains the need for land use planning. The request does not effect only the Harmon’s; it effects everyone that lives near it. Flooding is already a problem in this area. If this large parcel of land becomes a macadam surface, it will significantly increase the potential of flooding for others. It was Mr. Ruane’s opinion that granting the rezoning request would have a negative effect on the surrounding neighborhood.
Council President Christiansen declared the hearing closed.
Mr. Lambert stated that there has been much confusion as to the position of the surrounding property owners and suggested that the matter be tabled to provide additional time for the property owners to become more familiar with the facts surrounding the proposed rezoning.
Mr. Lambert stated that C-3 is an aggressive zoning classification. Mr. Harmon has stated that if the mini-storage facility does not come to fruition he will have no objections to reverting the zoning back to a residential zone, but Mr. Lambert stated that it is very difficult to downzone a property once it has been zoned at a higher density.
Mr. Lambert moved to table the matter to provide time for the interested property owners to gather more information and to make their feelings known to City Council. The motion was seconded by Mr. Weller.
Mr. Leary asked what additional information is needed in order to make a decision on the rezoning request. He stated his opinion that the necessary information has been reviewed and the public has had the opportunity to address members of the Planning Commission and City Council during public hearings.
Mr. Weller withdrew his second to the motion.
Mr. Lambert moved to deny the rezoning request but the motion failed for lack of a second.
Mr. Truitt moved to approve the rezoning request. The motion was seconded by Mr. Leary and by a vote of seven (7) yes, one (1) no (Mr. Lambert) and one (1) absent (Mr. Fenimore), Council adopted the following ordinance:
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DOVER BY CHANGING THE ZONING DESIGNATION OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1427 NEW BURTON ROAD.
WHEREAS, the City of Dover has enacted a zoning ordinance regulating the use of property within the limits of the City of Dover; and
WHEREAS, it is deemed in the best interest of zoning and planning to change the permitted use of property described below from R-8 (Single Family Residential) to C-3 (Service Commercial).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET:
1. That from and after the passage and approval of this ordinance the Zoning Map and Zoning Ordinance of the City of Dover has been amended by changing the zoning designation from R-8 to C-3 on that property located at 1427 New Burton Road, owned by Ronald L. and Janet L. Harmon.
ADOPTED: September 8, 1997
Noting that approval of the rezoning was not in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, the City Solicitor requested that each member of Council that voted in favor of the rezoning give explanation for their vote.
Mr. Lambert - Voted no
Mr. Pitts - Yes -The requested zone is the only zone that permits the mini-storage use and the neighbors have stated that they do not object to the proposed mini-storage facility.
Mr. Leary - Yes - The process for site plan review will take into consideration all concerns for lighting, buffering, etc. Precautions and safeguards for the surrounding neighbors will be addressed by the Planning Commission during Site Plan Review.
Mr. Truitt - Yes - Reiterated Mr. Leary’s statement. In addition, Mr. Truitt stated that he has read all correspondence and it seems that the opposition centers around a misunderstanding. He trusts that the property owner will do what he has stated he plans to do. He believes that the proposed project will be more of a benefit to the neighbors than other possible types of development.
Mrs. Malone - Yes - Reiterated Mr. Leary’s statement. Also, Mrs. Malone stated that since the Harmon’s home is adjacent to the site being rezoned, she felt that they would ensure that the business is not detrimental to the neighborhood and that they would immediately address any problems of the neighbors that may arise as a result of the proposed development.
Mr. Salters - Yes - The Harmon’s live on the adjacent property, and own another business that adjoins the property. He felt that this offered some guarantee that the Harmon’s would develop the property in a manner that would be conducive with the existing neighborhood.
Mr. Weller - Yes - His review shows mixed reactions from the surrounding property owners, but he believes the Harmon’s will take the concerns of the neighbors into consideration and he does not believe that the proposal will have a negative effect on the surrounding neighbors.
Mr. Christiansen - Yes - He believes it is a project that will not be intrusive into the neighborhood. The City offers protection to the surrounding neighbors through the Site Plan Review process. Also, it is the only zone that permits the use of mini-storage facilities. In this light, he suggested that sometime in the future the City look into another classification for mini-storage facilities.
UTILITY COMMITTEE REPORT
The Utility Committee met on August 25, 1997 with Chairman Lambert presiding.
Miscellaneous Water and Sewer Piping and Appurtenances
The Department of Public Works prepared a prospective annual bid list for miscellaneous water and sewer piping and appurtenances to be used in various public works projects throughout the City of Dover. Two bids were received, as follows:
U.S. Filter/Water Pro (Milford, Delaware) $62,416.25
Utility Piping Systems, Inc. (Newark, Delaware) $74,767.35
The bids are estimated costs for purchases of water and sewer piping and appurtenances for the current year based on the previous year’s purchases.
The committee recommended acceptance of the low bid from U.S. Filter/Water Pro in the amount of $62,416.25.
Mr. Lambert moved for approval of the committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mr. Leary and carried by a unanimous roll call vote (Mr. Fenimore absent).
Proposed Ordinance - Properties/Utilities Policy - Authority to City Manager and Treasurer
Mr. Lambert introduced civilian members of the Communications Committee, Mr. K.C. Sheth and Mr. Irving Levitt, and recognized that prior to taking office, Councilman Charles Weller also served as a civilian member. Council members serving on the committee are Mr. Fenimore and Mr. Lambert. City staff members are Mr. O’Connor and Mr. Karia. He relayed his appreciation to the members for their efforts in bringing this matter to fruition as well as their input and expertise during the committee’s deliberations.
The City’s Communications Committee has been in the process of developing a Telecommunication Policy for the past several months. It is the committee’s feeling that such a policy will enhance the communication services in Dover and develop guidelines. Since there are various aspects of such a policy, the Communications Committee directed staff to submit recommendations in segments as they are completed for their review and recommendation.
The City owns and maintains rights-of-ways, easements, underground facilities, electric poles, streets and various other properties. Upon acquiring rights-of-ways and easements, the City installs poles and other physical improvements. The City maintains and improves the streets, sidewalks and curbs and performs the tree trimming function to keep the properties in working condition. The City incurs operating expenses that include labor, materials and services for maintenance of these properties. Considering a recent request by a private firm for use of the City’s rights-of-ways and poles, staff developed a proposed strategy to share and off-set the City’s costs for maintenance and acquisition of rights-of-ways, easements and poles.
As a result, the Communications Committee recommended approval of an ordinance establishing a policy authorizing the City Manager and Treasurer to negotiate lease agreements for the use of City rights-of-ways. Realizing that the proposal would involve the City’s electric and water/wastewater departments, as well as other agencies such as Bell Atlantic, Chesapeake Utilities and Comcast Cable, the committee held meetings with all agencies to discuss the proposed ordinance. The proposed policy will also eliminate the franchise fee issue.
Mr. O’Connor stated that staff is in the process of establishing a cost formula by identifying all costs of acquisition, maintenance and operation of rights-of-ways and easements, to include liability insurance, tree trimming, future maintenance of sidewalks and streets. He explained that the proposed ordinance must be approved before staff can negotiate the price for such a lease agreement.
The committee recommended approval of the proposed ordinance.
Mr. Lambert moved for approval of the committee’s recommendation, seconded by Mrs. Malone and unanimously carried. (The First Reading of the ordinance will take place during the latter part of the meeting.)
Mr. Lambert moved for acceptance of the Utility Committee Report, seconded by Mrs. Malone and unanimously carried.
FIRST READING - PROPOSED ORDINANCE
Mrs. Malone moved to waive the reading of the proposed ordinance before Council, seconded by Mr. Leary and unanimously carried. Council President Christiansen reminded the public that copies of the proposed ordinance are available at the entrance of the Council Chambers or can be obtained from the City Clerk's Office. Final action by Council on the proposed ordinance will take place during the Council Meeting of September 22, 1997.
Mrs. Malone moved for acknowledgment of the first reading of the following proposed ordinances, by title only, seconded by Mr. Leary and unanimously carried:
∙ CHAPTER 22 - UTILITIES, ARTICLE VI - PROPERTIES/UTILITIES POLICY AND REGULATIONS, SECTION 22-260 - AUTHORITY OF CITY MANAGER AND TREASURER
FINAL READING - PROPOSED BUDGET ORDINANCE
The First Reading of the following proposed budget ordinance was accomplished during the Council Meeting of August 25, 1997.
Mr. Leary moved that the final reading of the proposed ordinance be acknowledged by title only, seconded by Mr. Salters and unanimously carried.
Mr. Leary moved for adoption of the following ordinance, seconded by Mrs. Malone and carried by a unanimous roll call vote:
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET:
The amounts hereinafter named in the various City funds are changed from the currently approved revenues/receipts and appropriations to the revised revenues/receipts and revised appropriations for use by the several departments of the Municipal Government for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1997 and ending June 30, 1998:
A. GENERAL FUND REVENUES
CURRENT +ADDITION/ REVISED
REVENUE BUDGET -REDUCTION ESTIMATE
Beginning Balance (7/1/97) $1,203,878 $+1,026,946 $2,230,824
State One-time Aid to City (New money) -0- +209,821 209,821
State One-time Aid to City (New money) -0- +237,427 237,427
B. GENERAL FUND - EXPENDITURES
CURRENT +ADDITION/ REVISED
DEPARTMENT BUDGET -REDUCTION ESTIMATE
Recreation $384,108 +$12,500 $396,608
Police - New Money - One-time State Aid 7,183,762 +209,821 7,454,583
Police +$50,000
Police +11,000
Capital Purchase -0- +290,000 290,000
Transfer to Fire 20,000 +20,000 40,000
Bike/Pedestrian Project -0- +26,457 26,457
Information Services 217,756 +77,262 295,018
City Clerk 87,194 +2,125 89,319
City Council 34,578 +250 34,828
One-Time State Aid
Recreation Building - Engineers Fee -0- +60,000 60,000
Public Works - Trash Truck -0- +68,600 68,600
Public Works - Sideloader -0- +108,827 108,827
Budget Balance (6/30/98) 178,959 +537,352 953,738
C. WATER/WASTEWATER FUND - REVENUES
CURRENT +ADDITION/ &#