REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING
The Regular Council Meeting was held on September 25, 1995 with Council President Christiansen presiding. Council members present were Mr. Lambert, Mr. Tudor, Mr. Leary, Mr. Pitts, Mrs. Malone, Mr. Fenimore, Mr. Salters and Mr. Hare.
Council staff members present were Chief Smith, Mr. Lucas, Mr. O'Connor, Mr. DePrima, Chief Baker, Mrs. Boaman and Mr. Rodriguez.
OPEN FORUM
The Open Forum was held at 7:15 p.m., prior to commencement of the Official Council Meeting. Council President Christiansen declared the open forum in session and reminded those present that Council is not in official session and cannot take formal action.
There was no one present wishing to speak during the Open Forum.
The invocation was given by Reverend Bernard S. Shuhayda, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance.
AGENDA ADDITIONS/DELETIONS
Council President Christiansen requested the addition of agenda item #1A for Mayor Hutchison to address members of Council and the public on recent problems at Dover High School. Mr. Leary requested the deletion of agenda item #9A (First Reading - Chapter 4 - Animal Ordinance) so that the issue of beekeeping may be discussed further by the committee.
Mr. Leary moved for approval of the agenda as amended, seconded by Mr. Hare and unanimously carried.
ADOPTION OF MINUTES - REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 11, 1995
The Minutes of the Regular Council Meeting of September 11, 1995 were unanimously approved by motion of Mr. Lambert, seconded by Mr. Leary and bore the written approval of Mayor Hutchison.
REMARKS - MAYOR JAMES L. HUTCHISON
Mayor James L. Hutchison addressed members of Council, City Staff and City residents on recent incidences of violence at Dover High School. Mayor Hutchison stated his pride in the manner in which school officials and students have handled this situation and in the support given by the City of Dover Police Department. A total of 11 youths have been arrested as a result of the altercations at the school. Mayor Hutchison stated that in his meetings with Dr. Crossen, Superintendent of the Capital School District, it has been made clear that the School District will not tolerate this type of behavior on the school property. In turn, Mayor Hutchison has assured the School District that the City of Dover supports the District in their actions against these problems and that we stand ready to assist them in any way possible. Mayor Hutchison stated that parents and students should be able to enter school grounds without fear for their personal safety or fear of encountering behavior that is totally unacceptable. He assured everyone that the City of Dover and the Capital School District will work closely together to ensure that this type of incident is not repeated and will not be tolerated. Mayor Hutchison stated that our City is growing and the needs of our community are changing and that we must be ready to address the issues associated with this growth. He stated that we cannot blame others for the problem and that the entire community must join together in our resolve in keeping our schools safe.
PROCLAMATION - WALK FOR RECOVERY DAY
The City Clerk read into the record the following Proclamation:
WHEREAS, substance abuse is a major public health problem that is both preventable and treatable; and
WHEREAS, Aids, birth defects, highway fatalities, domestic violence, child abuse, violent crimes and the cost of prosecution, incarceration, health care, and loss of work productivity could be reduced through education and various treatment programs; and
WHEREAS, funds for treatment services continue to be inadequate to serve the many people who need and request help despite the overwhelming scientific evidence and the irrefutable collective experience that treatment works and is cost effective; and
WHEREAS, the Addictions Coalition of Delaware, Inc., will be coordinating the Seventh Annual "Treatment Works" Month in September 1995, helping to increase awareness of the belief that treatment really does work.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, JAMES L. HUTCHISON, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF DOVER, DELAWARE, do hereby proclaim September 30, 1995, as "WALK FOR RECOVERY DAY" in the City of Dover, and urge citizens to recognize the importance treatment can have on society and to support the efforts of the Addictions Coalition of Delaware, Inc.
The Proclamation was presented to Gayle Navert, Marion Harris and Ed Sulek by Council President Christiansen.
PROCLAMATION - PUBLIC POWER WEEK
The City Clerk read into the record the following Proclamation:
WHEREAS, we, the citizens of Dover, are proud of our choice to operate a community-owned, not-for-profit electric utility, and
WHEREAS, we, the citizens of Dover, are both consumers and owners of our public power system, and
WHEREAS, the City of Dover Electric Utility provides our homes, businesses, farms, social service and local government agencies with reliable, efficient, and cost-effective electricity employing sound business practices designed to ensure the best possible service at the lowest possible rates, and
WHEREAS, public ownership of the City of Dover Electric Utility assures not-for-profit electric rates and citizen participation in electric utility operations and policies.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, JAMES L. HUTCHISON, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF DOVER, do hereby proclaim the week of October 1-7, 1995, as PUBLIC POWER WEEK in the City of Dover to honor the utility, its employees, and its consumer-owners who work together to provide the best possible electric service and invite all citizens of Dover to an open house to be held in their honor at the offices and power plant of the City of Dover Electric Department. The open house will take place on October 7th between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. on Buttner Place just off Walker Road.
PROCLAMATION - NATIONAL ARTS AND HUMANITIES MONTH
The City Clerk read into the record the following Proclamation:
WHEREAS, the month of October is National Arts and Humanities Month in the United States; and
WHEREAS, the United States Conference of Mayors encourages all cities, towns and communities in the United States to proclaim, commemorate and observe National Arts and Humanities Month; and
WHEREAS, the City of Dover enjoys a rich cultural life which benefits all the citizens and businesses; and
WHEREAS, the City of Dover has a municipal arts council, the Dover Arts Council, which is a City-administered agency with a volunteer Board of Directors; and
WHEREAS, the Dover Arts Council has identified 82 local groups and organizations involved in the arts and humanities -- including non-profit organizations, school/institution-based groups, and arts/humanities-related businesses; and
WHEREAS, the City of Dover desires, supports and encourages high levels of arts and humanities activities.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, JAMES L. HUTCHISON, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF DOVER, DELAWARE, do hereby proclaim the month of October 1995, as ARTS AND HUMANITIES MONTH in the City of Dover.
The Proclamation was presented to Dr. Don Parks, Chairman of the Dover Arts Council, by Council President Christiansen. Dr. Parks expressed appreciation for the Proclamation and noted the importance of arts and culture to our community. He encouraged the citizens to think more about what we can do for young people, who seem to have a lot of idle time, to get them more interested in the arts. He felt that participation by our youth would encourage activity in positive opportunities and allow them to push their energies to their greatest potential, making great citizens for our community. Dr. Parks urged members of Council and our citizens to become involved with the Dover Arts Council and cultural activities of the community.
PROCLAMATION - HALLOWEEN OBSERVANCE
The City Clerk read into the record the following Proclamation:
WHEREAS, the City of Dover wishes a safe and festive Halloween celebration for its citizens and encourages participation in the gaiety of this holiday by both young and old; and
WHEREAS, parents are prompted to join in the festivities by accompanying their children throughout their journey of gathering treats as is the custom of the celebration of Halloween; and
WHEREAS, the observation of this holiday, for extended periods, is an inconvenience to the public and contributes to the possibility of damage and destruction of personal property; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor of the City of Dover has deemed it advisable to observe the celebration of Halloween Trick-or-Treat on Tuesday, October 31, 1995 between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, JAMES L. HUTCHISON, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF DOVER, DO HEREBY PROCLAIM:
1. That the Halloween Trick-or-Treat observance shall be held on the 31st day of October, 1995 between the hours of 6:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m.
2. That the residents of the City of Dover, or any other persons within the corporate limits of the City of Dover, limit their observance of this holiday to the aforesaid date and time, in an effort to maintain a fun and safe environment for everyone participating in the festivities.
ANNEXATION/REZONING - PROPERTY LOCATED ON SW SIDE OF INTERSECTION OF FOREST STREET AND SAULSBURY ROAD - REED & OTHERS
An annexation referendum was held on September 14, 1995 for property located on the southwest side of the intersection of Forest Street and Saulsbury Road, owned by Maynard C. Reed & Mary B. Reed Estate, Robert Joe Kilby and James C. Brown, and containing approximately 14.6+/- acres.
Referendum Results
The City Clerk reported that the referendum was held on September 14, 1995 for properties owned by The Reed Estate, Robert Joe Kilby, and The Beiser Group who recently purchased lands of James C. Brown. Only one of the owners cast a vote in the referendum. There was one vote cast in favor of the annexation and no votes cast against annexation.
Mr. Hare moved for approval of the referendum results, seconded by Mr. Leary and unanimously carried.
Annexation
By motion of Mr. Hare, seconded by Mr. Fenimore, Council adopted the following Resolution by a unanimous roll call vote:
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE INCLUSION OF AN AREA WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF DOVER.
WHEREAS, the Charter of the City of Dover authorizes Council to extend the boundaries of the said City after a special election of the qualified voters and real estate owners of the territory proposed to be annexed, and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Council of the City of Dover deem it in the best interest of the City of Dover to include an area contiguous to the present City limits, and hereinafter more particularly described within the limits of the City of Dover, and
WHEREAS, the Charter of the City of Dover provides that if a majority of the votes cast in an election held in a territory proposed to be annexed shall be in favor of inclusion of that territory within the limits of the City of Dover, the Council may thereupon adopt a resolution annexing said territory and including same within the limits of the City of Dover.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET:
1. That the following described area, situated in East Dover Hundred, Kent County, State of Delaware, shall be annexed to and included within the limits of the City of Dover:
Beginning at the Southeasterly end of 75.00 foot radius junction curve connecting the Southerly line of Forrest Avenue with the Westerly line of Saulsbury Road. Thence from said beginning point and with said line of Saulsbury Road the following three (3) courses and distances:
1. S 03o 17'06" W a distance of 45.04 feet to a point of curvature;
2. By an arc of a circle curving to the left with a radius of 2914.76 feet a distance of 262.85 feet (its chord being S 00o42'05" W a distance of 262.76 feet) to a point of tangency;
3. S 01o52'55" E a distance of 12.48 feet to a point in said line of Saulsbury Road at a corner for land of the aforementioned Hartnett Realty Company. Thence with said land of Hartnett Realty Company the following two (2) courses and distances:
4. S 03o39'49" W a distance of 270.90 feet to a point;
5. N 70o37'00" E a distance of 27.45 feet to a point at a corner for said Hartnett Realty Company in the Westerly line of Saulsbury Road. Thence with said line of Saulsbury Road:
6. S 01o52'55" E a distance of 312.49 feet to a point in said line of Saulsbury Road at a corner for lands of the State of Delaware. Thence with lands of the State of Delaware and then lands of the aforementioned Del-Homes Group, L.L.C.:
7. N 86o27'18" E a distance of 990.79 feet to a point at a corner for lands of said Dover Laundry and Dry Cleaners Inc. in the Southerly line of Forrest Avenue. Thence with said line of Forrest Avenue the following three (3) courses and distances:
8. N 08o27'18" E a distance of 990.79 feet to a point at a corner for lands of said Dover Laundry and Dry Cleaners Inc. in the Southerly line of Forrest Avenue. Thence with said line of Forrest Avenue the following three (3) courses and distances:
9. S 85o50'24" E a distance of 204.20 feet to a point;
10. S 79o01'03" E a distance of 101.02 feet to a point;
11. S 85o50'24" E a distance of 210.53 feet to a point in said line of Forrest Avenue at the Northwesterly end of the aforementioned junction curve. Thence with said curve:
12. By an arc of a circle curving to the right with a radius of 75.00 feet a distance of 116.66 feet (its chord being S 41o16'37" E a distance of 105.25 feet) to the point and place of beginning.
Containing within the above described courses and distances an area of 14.6 +/- acres.
The above described property is subject to any rights-of-way, easements or restrictions as may be shown or noted in any public records, or any regulation or requirement of any public agency.
2. The above described property shall be annexed into the City of Dover with a zoning classification of SC-2 (Community Shopping Center) in accordance with the zoning map and environs, then in force, effective upon such lands being included within the limits of the City of Dover.
3. That the certified copy of the resolution of annexation, together with a plot of the area annexed, shall be filed for record with the Recorder of Deeds of Kent County.
4. That the effective date of this resolution shall be the 26th day of September, 1995 at 12:01 a.m. o'clock.
ADOPTED: September 25, 1995
Public Hearing - Zoning Classification
The City Planner, Mr. Tony DePrima, explained that the property owners of the parcels are Maynard C. and Mary B. Reed Estate, Robert Joe Kilby, and James C. Brown and the applicant of the petition is John T. Beiser. The land is currently zoned as RS (Residential Single Family) and BN (Neighborhood Business) in Kent County. The applicant requested annexation of the land into the City of Dover and rezoning to SC-1 (Neighborhood Shopping Center) & C-2A (Limited Commercial).
Mr. DePrima explained that the recommendation of the Planning Commission was for approval of the annexation with the condition that 0.6 acres from the lands of Enterprise Business Park be added to the site so that it can all be zoned SC-2 (Community Shopping Center) thereby eliminating the need for both SC-1 and C2-A. The SC-2 zone requires a minimum of 15 acres.
In making their recommendation, the Planning Commission considered the current surrounding land uses, the Interim Annexation Policy, the Route #8 Corridor Study, and the recommendations of the City Planning staff.
The Interim Annexation Policy adopted by the City Council classifies this property as a Category 1 - Land Desirable for Annexation. This property is designated as such because it is surrounded by land incorporated in the City. Islands such as these create confusion and inconsistencies with regard to the delivery of service, code enforcement and jurisdiction. These areas enjoy the benefits of Dover city amenities without sharing in the costs.
The area of this annexation request was recently studied as a part of the Delaware Route #8, McKee, Saulsbury and Kenton Road Corridor Study which was subsequently adopted by City Council as an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan on December 9, 1991. The following are some of the related points from the adopted study:
1. The Plan designates two land uses for this parcel. Along Route #8 and Saulsbury Road to a depth of 250 feet the plan recommends commercial development. The remaining land or approximately half of the parcel is recommended for medium density housing (R8, RG-1, or RG-3 zones)
2. For commercial development along Route #8 in general, the study states "Commercial uses should be confined to areas identified in the land use recommendation. These uses should cater to the local neighborhood, rather than the regional market." The study goes on to state: "Commercial development within the study area should function as centers of aggregate uses which cater to needs of the local community. Commercial development such as food and drug stores, bakeries, dry cleaner and day care centers are among preferred uses, while no increase in the number of auto service or liquor stores should be allowed. These centers should have limitation in size and should not be allowed to expand into continuous strips along the corridor, but be separated by districts of non-commercial uses".
For the most part, the proposed community shopping center meets the above criteria. The developer is emphasizing its local orientation and centrally focussed design. However, a center at this location will put great pressure on Route #8 between Greentree Village and this site to develop in a strip fashion.
3. The Study text specifically recommends the following at this intersection: "offices and personal service uses (travel agency, insurance, etc). Because of traffic conflicts at this major intersection, retail uses, drive in window uses, convenience stores and filling stations are discouraged".
4. The intersection is designated as an "image" area that is very visible and announces the transition from the urban areas of central Dover into the suburban areas to the west of Dover. As an "image area" the design of future development and the image that it portrays is important not only to the site, but to the whole west side of Dover. This intersection serves as a gateway to west Dover when traveling westbound on Route #8.
It must also be noted that the 1986 Comprehensive Plan similarly designated this property for commercial and residential uses. A zoning map which recommended city zones for these lands recommended C-3 (Service Commercial) in the same approximate area as the commercial designation in the Corridor Study, and R-8 single family homes in the residential areas.
Other matters considered were:
1. This proposal provides an opportunity to unify and bring together three parcels into one parcel that can be designed into a unified fashion. Without the unification of the parcels it is likely that development will evolve in a haphazard fashion.
The Corridor Study noted the excessive number of curb cuts along Route #8 as a constraint to orderly development and stated the following: "As the corridors make the transition from rural to arterial, curb cuts become a problem. Original residential units with accompanying curb cuts occur as often as every 60 linear feet. Residential units are being converted to commercial uses which increase traffic and compound the traffic problems".
In addition, under the Study's design guidelines it states "The frequency of curb cuts and their lack of definition create congestion and confusion. This image and safety problem can be corrected through consolidation and elimination of unnecessary curb cuts. Also, the relocation and enhancement of major entrances will help to visually organize the corridor." The proposed development accomplishes this goal.
2. This property is adjacent to undeveloped lands to the west. These lands are approximately the same size of the parcel in question and are designated for medium density residential development. The subject property will set the pace for the development of these other properties in the future.
It is important that the proposed development of the site address the access of lands to the west and accommodate the uses proposed. The developer has provided sketches of how this development would provide access to the adjacent land. The sketches provide access on the north and south side of the development and appear to be adequate.
3. A Support Facilities Report by DelDOT, which serves as a first cut traffic analysis, indicates that the level of service for Route #8 will drop from an "A" to a "B", and that Saulsbury Road will drop from a "D" to an "E". This makes an assumption that there will not be an entrance or exit on Route #8. The Developer is currently planning for an entrance.
It is important to note that Level of Service "E" for a roadway as may occur on Saulsbury Road is considered to be an objectionable element as described in the performance standard of the zoning ordinance and may be a reason for denying site plan approval.
4. The location of this property is in the vicinity of the Enterprize Business Park and existing and proposed residential area. It affords a unique opportunity to bring together housing, employment opportunities, and commercial services in one area; therefore, vehicle and pedestrian access, buffering, and proper placement of buildings will be important issues to address on the site.
Mr. DePrima stated that as a cautionary note, it is important to point out that the Route #8 Corridor Study recommended significantly less commercial development at this site because of "traffic conflicts at this major intersection". The DelDOT DAC comments and Support Facility Report serve to reiterate this concern, and the issue of whether an entrance on Route #8 still remains unresolved. The developer understands that if the Planning Commission and City Council annex and zone this property as proposed without the benefit of further traffic analysis, and that if the subsequent required Traffic Impact Analysis continues to reveal "traffic congestion" as defined in the City's zoning performance standards, then it is possible that only a substantially scaled down shopping center may be approved.
It is also important to note that if this property is annexed and zoned it may fall under the current development policy that prohibits site plan applications involving more than 20 EDU's of sewer flow. A plan for the project could not move forward until the policy is lifted as a result of the adoption of a new comprehensive plan and that during the comprehensive plan update the proposed zoning may be reconsidered.
Council President Christiansen declared the public hearing open.
There was no one present wishing to speak for or against the proposed rezoning.
Council President Christiansen declared the public hearing closed.
Mr. Lambert moved for approval of the rezoning request as recommended by the Planning Commission, seconded by Mrs. Malone. By a unanimous roll call vote, Council adopted the following ordinance. (The first reading of the proposed ordinance was accomplished during the Council Meeting of June 26. 1995.)
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF DOVER BY CHANGING THE ZONING DESIGNATION OF PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF FORREST AVENUE AND SAULSBURY ROAD.
WHEREAS, the City of Dover has enacted a zoning ordinance regulating the use of property within the limits of the City of Dover; and
WHEREAS, it is deemed in the best interest of zoning and planning to change the permitted use of property described below from BN - Neighborhood Business and R-S - Residential Single Family (Kent County zoning classification) to SC-2 - Community Shopping Center (City of Dover zoning classification).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET:
1. That from and after the passage and approval of this ordinance the Zoning Map and Zoning Ordinance of the City of Dover has been amended by changing the zoning designation from BN and R-S (Kent County zoning classification) to SC-2 (City of Dover zoning classification) on that property located at the southwest intersection of Forrest Avenue and Saulsbury Road, owned by Maynard C. & Mary B. Reed Estate, Robert Joe Kilby and James C. Brown.
ADOPTED: September 25, 1995
SAFETY ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT
The Safety Advisory Committee met on September 12, 1995 with Chairman Hare presiding.
Request to Permanently Close Hope Street - Kent General Hospital
Members considered a letter from Mr. James J. Woodward, Executive Vice President/CO of Kent General Hospital, requesting permission to close Hope Street on a permanent basis. He reminded members that approximately 16 months ago, the City authorized Kent General Hospital to temporarily close Hope Street, at the corner of Governors Avenue, while construction of their new Outpatient Services Center was underway. There are two (2) specific concerns that have initiated the request to permanently close Hope Street: 1) public safety of patients and visitors utilizing the new Outpatient Services Center; and 2) the hospital's ability to safely accommodate access to this area for the many disabled patients and visitors which will utilize this entrance to the hospital. It was their feeling that the closing of the street will enable them to improve access and parking for disabled patients and visitors while greatly enhancing their safety in accessing the Outpatient Services Center and outpatient parking facilities. They also felt that the change would not have a negative impact on traffic flow patterns along Governors Avenue and State Street but will, in fact, improve the overall safety for both vehicles and pedestrians travelling near this area of Hope Street.
Mr. Hare advised members that prior to submitting their request for street abandonment, he suggested that the request be presented to Council for a consensus and to provide the Hospital the opportunity to clarify any concerns. He reminded members that in accordance with the procedures for street abandonment, the request would be presented to all City Departments and the Planning Commission for their review and recommendation to Council. Mr. Hare stated that in accordance with the street abandonment procedure, the public would be given the opportunity to address members of Council. However, this matter is currently being presented to members to see if the request should be pursued.
Mr. Christiansen relayed concern regarding emergency accessibility. He explained that when the emergency room was relocated to the east side of the hospital, an agreement was established that prohibited ambulances entering the hospital emergency room from the northern end of the County to travel on State Street due to the width of the street and amount of traffic. Since these ambulances are required to travel on Governors Avenue, Mr. Christiansen questioned if there would still be emergency access through Hope Street to access the hospital emergency room.
Responding, Mr. Woodward advised members that according to the conceptual plan, the hospital emergency room would only be accessible via State Street. He stated that the proposal is based on conceptual ideas only at this time and assured members that any suggestions would be considered. Mr. Christiansen suggested that the proposal allow emergency vehicles to travel Governors Avenue to access the hospital's emergency room, explaining that Governors Avenue is much wider and less congested than State Street.
Mr. Tudor noted that the area proposed for abandonment contains a major sewer and water line and questioned if the normal easement that would be obtained would suffice and suggested that staff consider this matter. Due to safety concerns, it was Mr. Lambert's feeling that the City would be remiss if they did not consider abandonment of the street as a possible solution.
The committee recommended that Kent General Hospital move forward with the street abandonment process.
Utilizing the consent format, Mr. Hare moved for approval of the committee's recommendation, seconded by Mr. Leary and unanimously carried.
Mr. Hare moved for acceptance of the Safety Advisory Committee Report, seconded by Mr. Leary and unanimously carried.
LEGISLATIVE AND FINANCE COMMITTEE
The Legislative and Finance Committee met on September 12, 1995 with Chairman Salters presiding. Mr. Salters noted that the item dealing with a proposed ordinance on bee keeping was deleted from the agenda and will be reviewed at the next committee meeting.
Presentation - Metropolitan Planning Organization - Long Range Transportation Plan
Ms. Juanita Wieczoreck, Executive Director of the Dover/Kent County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), and Mr. Ralph Reed, of the Delaware Department of Transportation, provided members with a summary of the Long Range Transportation Plan and welcomed any comments and suggestions. Ms. Wieczoreck advised members that three (3) public meetings have been scheduled to receive comments and suggestions from the citizens regarding the Dover/Kent County Metropolitan Area Transportation Plan, which consists of three elements: 1) the vision; 2) the system assessment; and 3) strategies.
Ms. Wieczoreck explained that the vision is a set of goals that describes how the County should be developed between now and the year 2020. This vision was developed in a three-step process: 1) historical and projected demographic data were analyzed, in order to identify those forces which have shaped the County in the past, and in order to anticipate which forces will shape it in the future; 2) a series of round table discussions were held with citizens representing 12 different segments of the County's population - the purpose of these round table discussions was to identify issues of concern to those components of the population; and 3) general public input was sought at two separate public forums. Ms. Wieczoreck stated that the vision is a composite of the opinions expressed by Kent Countians during the public involvement process. As a result of the vision process, four (4) major goals for the transportation system were developed: 1) support economic development; 2) maintain the current quality of life; 3) effectively manage growth; and 4) improve access and mobility. The opportunity for close interaction with political leaders, the availability of nearby open space, woodlands, the Delaware Bay, other undeveloped areas, and extensive agricultural lands are the small characteristics which are highly valued by area residents of Dover and Kent County.
In regards to the System Assessment, Ms. Wieczoreck stated that the Dover/Kent County MPO reviewed the population and employment projections. Once these projections were identified, they were applied to a travel demand model which identified where deficiencies and transportation congestion would occur by the year 2020. Members were provided with diagrams that depicted the population and employment density in 1990 and in 2020 and a map indicating those roads that would be most congested by the year 2020. As a result of this assessment, the Dover/Kent County MPO developed a Facilities Areas Services (FAS) Matrix. Ms. Wieczoreck requested that members review the Matrix and advise her if any issues and concerns were not addressed for a particular facility.
Ms. Wieczoreck stated that the final part of the plan will be the strategies that will address future transportation needs, including policy statements as well as actual transportation improvements. The policy statements will support the comprehensive plans of Kent County, the City of Dover and other municipalities for consideration of growth and preservation areas. She stated that there are three (3) ways of classifying transportation improvements: 1) system preservation; 2) system management; and 3) system expansion. The plan will include strategies for each of these areas, with preservation being the priority. Other considerations that were made in developing the plan included air quality and financial constraints.
Referring to the draft Vision Statement, Council President Christiansen noted that Dover Air Force Base is mentioned several times as an important economic force; however, the transportation systems listed that should support economic development (goal #1) does not include the completion of that section of S.R. #1 in front of DAFB. He also relayed concern with item #1.1 which includes the construction of the Puncheon Run Connector and urged the Dover/Kent County MPO to abandon the project as previously requested by the City of Dover. It was his feeling that if the Puncheon Run Connector project was abandoned, the completion of the interchange at DAFB, which is extremely economically important to the City of Dover and Kent County, could be accomplished. He also felt that this would allow the Scarborough Road project to be expedited and would eliminate the need for some of the other interchanges and would facilitate getting traffic in and out of Dover in a rapid manner.
Responding, Ms. Wieczoreck advised members that the interchange at DAFB is underway. It is her understanding that until the traffic volumes on Route #10 warrant it, the Puncheon Run Connector would not be constructed. She indicated, however, that the Puncheon Run Connector is still in the transportation improvement program and capital improvement program scheduled for construction in fiscal year 1998, which begins July 1997. Ms. Wieczoreck suggested that the City's representative of the Dover/Kent County MPO Counsel present this matter to the Counsel requesting action to remove the item from the transportation improvement program.
Mr. Lambert felt that the development of a western by-pass would eliminate the need for the Puncheon Run Connector as well as reduce the need for additional interchanges that have been proposed. He requested that the Dover/Kent County MPO seriously consider the development of a western by-pass.
Ms. Wieczoreck reminded members that although the Dover/Kent County MPO must consider the needs of the residents of the City of Dover, they must also consider the residents of Kent County. She stated that although a western by-pass would assist the City, it would be out of the City's jurisdiction and would put untold development pressure on the County. Ms. Wieczoreck indicated that there is a regional concern that a western by-pass could result in sprawl developments, since this type of facility attracts developments. She advised members that consideration must also be given to the costs of a western by-pass, which would be incredibly expensive.
Mr. Lambert requested that the Dover/Kent County MPO work with the City of Dover and Kent County to develop a solution that would satisfy the needs of both parties involved.
No action was taken by the committee or by Council.
Progress Report - Comprehensive Plan
Mr. DePrima, City Planner, provided members with a progress report of the Comprehensive Plan Update, which has been entitled "THE DOVER PLAN: From The People - For The People". A final recommendation is scheduled to be presented to Council for consideration by May 1996.
The Planning Team has met their goal this past summer in developing a computer mapping system, collecting data, and analyzing demographic changes as well as the past ten (10) years of development changes and environmental information. This information will be presented to the public during workshops which have been scheduled for October and November. The purpose of this phase is to develop land use and transportation plan goals and policies through public discussions and workshops. During the winter, the Planning Team will utilize the information obtained from the citizens and blend it with the information that was gathered in the summer to develop plan recommendations (land use and zoning) for City Council. In the spring of 1996, these recommendations will be presented to the public for comment and ultimately presented to Council for adoption in May 1996.
Mr. DePrima provided several maps and graphs depicting existing land use, annexations, and development trends (site plan approvals, subdivisions and conditional uses) zoning and building permit data from 1985 through 1995. He also provided graphs indicating Dover's changing population and employment patterns. Mr. DePrima advised members that this fall, analyzing and mapping of road classifications, locations of substandard roads and intersections, levels of service of major roads, and alternative models for long range planning will be accomplished. All this information must be analyzed and considered in the Comprehensive Plan Update.
Mr. DePrima stated that the theme "from the people - for the people" was selected since it was felt that it emphasizes the Planning Team's desire to present ideas to the public as well as to gather ideas and thoughts from the public. The purpose of the fall schedule phase is to develop land use and transportation plan goals and policies through public discussions and workshops. Eight (8) community workshops will be held throughout the City and a combination of slides, questionnaires, and planning exercises will be used to engage attendees into discussing the future of Dover. Staff is currently arranging Child Care to be available on site during these workshops. Mr. DePrima stated that in an effort to develop a format that is interesting and engaging for the attendees, there will be discussions on areas that are of common interest to all, planning issues, and specific issues related to their neighborhoods. During these workshops, citizens will be provided with maps of their neighborhood, scissors, markers, pens, pencils and glue sticks so that they may design their neighborhood in the way they would like to see it developed. Mr. DePrima advised members that in December, workshops will be planned specifically for young people at the high school and two middle schools in conjunction with the Capital School District. The dates, times, neighborhoods and locations from the community plan workshops are available in the City of Dover Planning Office.
The committee recommended acceptance of the Comprehensive Plan Update Progress Report as presented and that staff move forward with the plan and commended Mr. DePrima and the Planning Team on their progress.
Utilizing the consent format, Mr. Salters moved for approval of the committee's recommendation, seconded by Mr. Hare and unanimously carried.
Revised Spending Plan - Community Development Block Grant Program
In May 1995, Council approved a spending plan for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. At that time, Council was advised that the senior citizen housing project was uncertain due to the status of the Bayard Hotel, which was the site being contemplated for senior housing, and that the $150,000 designated for this project could be redirected if it did not come to fruition.
Mr. DePrima advised members that the new owner of the Bayard Hotel does not intend to proceed with a senior housing project and that there are no other similar projects at this time. Several other projects were presented to members for consideration of the CDBG funds, in the amount of $316,000. Included in that amount was $40,000 (Extra Duty Police Office - City of Dover Police Department) which was to provide additional officers in the downtown target area. There was considerable discussion on the proposed costs for the extra duty police officers. However, since Mr. Hare, the Chairman of the Sub-Committee, was not available to address the concerns, it was suggested that members defer action on the request to allow Mr. Hare the opportunity to further explain the request for extra duty police officers in the area.
The committee recommended acceptance of the proposed CDBG Entitlement Grant Request as submitted by staff, stipulating that further clarification be provided by Mr. Hare and Chief Smith regarding the request for extra duty police officers.
A memorandum from Mr. DePrima explained that the issue of enhanced Police services has been resolved and that the revised spending plan is satisfactory to the Mayor, Police Chief and Mr. Hare. The only change was to make the use of Police funds more flexible, but the amount of $40,000 remains the same.
Utilizing the consent format, Mr. Salters moved for approval of the committee's recommendation and made note of the memorandum of clarification from Mr. DePrima. The motion was seconded by Mr. Hare and Council unanimously approved the following:
Extra Duty Police Officer - City of Dover Police Department
Funds are requested to enhance crime prevention in the target areas through a variety of policing techniques that will be used throughout the program year as determined by the Chief of Police based on the needs of the target block communities.
Total Funding....................$40,000
Dover Housing Development Corporation, Inc. - Home Owner Occupant Buy-Down
Acquire and rehabilitate five (5) single family or duplex units that have been identified by the City as either illegally converted rental properties or properties with multiple code violations. Upon completion of the rehabilitation, sell the properties to eligible low/moderate income families. The requested funds will be used to write down the after rehabilitation mortgages so that they are affordable to the low/moderate income home buyers selected for the program.
Total Funding....................$30,000
Dover Housing Development Corporation, Inc. - Construction of Four Townhouse Units
The project involves the demolition of an existing two (2) story structure on Slaughter Street and the construction of four (4), three (3) bedroom townhouses on the cleared site. The completed units will be rented to low-income households.
Total Funding....................$30,000
Kirkwood Community Center Agency, Inc.
Funds are requested to support the Kirkwood Community Center building rehabilitation. Upon completion of the project, the program will be designed to help alleviate many of the community problems. The following programs will be offered for youth, recreation, tutoring, education and counseling programs designed to aid children who have difficulties in their studies, field trips, food pantry and nutritious meals. The center has entertained several related activities for social enjoyment and family unity for low income children in the target and surrounding areas of the City of Dover.
&#